CT-derived body composition assessment as a prognostic tool in oncologic patients: From opportunistic research to artificial intelligence-based clinical implementation Review


Authors: Bates, D. D. B.; Pickhardt, P. J.
Review Title: CT-derived body composition assessment as a prognostic tool in oncologic patients: From opportunistic research to artificial intelligence-based clinical implementation
Abstract: CT-based body composition measures are well established in research settings as prognostic markers in oncologic patients. Numerous retrospective studies have shown the role of objective measurements extracted from abdominal CT images of skeletal muscle, abdominal fat, and bone mineral density in providing more accurate assessments of frailty and cancer cachexia in comparison with traditional clinical methods. Quantitative CT-based measurements of liver fat and aortic atherosclerotic calcification have received relatively less attention in cancer care but also provide prognostic information. Patients with cancer routinely undergo serial CT examinations for staging, treatment response, and surveillance, providing the opportunity for quantitative body composition assessment to be performed as part of routine clinical care. The emergence of fully automated artificial intelligence-based segmentation and quantification tools to replace earlier time-consuming manual and semiautomated methods for body composition analysis will allow these opportunistic measures to transition from the research realm to clinical practice. With continued investigation, the measurements may ultimately be applied to achieve more precise risk stratification as a component of personalized oncologic care.
Keywords: retrospective studies; tomography, x-ray computed; oncology; retrospective study; artificial intelligence; body composition; ct; procedures; cancer; humans; prognosis; human; x-ray computed tomography
Journal Title: American Journal of Roentgenology
Volume: 219
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0361-803X
Publisher: American Roentgen Ray Society  
Date Published: 2022-10-01
Start Page: 671
End Page: 680
Language: English
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.27749
PUBMED: 35642760
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Review -- Export Date: 1 November 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. David Dawson Bartlett Bates
    53 Bates