Is nodal clipping beneficial for node-positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy? Journal Article


Authors: Montagna, G.; Lee, M. K.; Sevilimedu, V.; Barrio, A. V.; Morrow, M.
Article Title: Is nodal clipping beneficial for node-positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
Abstract: Background: In cN1 patients rendered cN0 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is < 10% when ≥ 3 sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are removed. The added value of nodal clipping in this scenario is unknown. Here we determine how often the clipped node is a sentinel node when ≥ 3 SLNs are retrieved. Methods: We identified cT1-3N1 patients treated between 02/2018 and 10/2021 with a clipped lymph node at presentation. SLNB was performed with a standardized approach of dual-tracer mapping and retrieval of ≥ 3 SLNs. Clipped nodes were not localized; SLNs were X-rayed intraoperatively to determine clip location. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed for any residual disease or retrieval of < 3 SLNs. Results: Of 269 patients, 251 (93%) had ≥ 3 SLNs. Median age was 51 years; the majority (92%) had ductal histology; 46% were HR+/HER2−. The median number of SLNs removed was 4 (IQR 3,5). The clipped node was an SLN in 88% (220/251) of cases. Of the 31 where the clipped node was not, 13 had a positive SLN mandating ALND, and the clip was identified in the ALND specimen. In the remaining 18, where ≥ 3 negative SLNs were retrieved and an ALND was not performed, the clip was not retrieved, with no axillary failures in this group (median follow-up: 55 months). Conclusion: When the SLNB procedure is optimized with dual tracer and retrieval of ≥ 3 SLNs, the clipped node is an SLN in the majority of cases, suggesting that failure to retrieve the clipped node should not be an indication for ALND. © 2022, Society of Surgical Oncology.
Keywords: adult; human tissue; middle aged; cancer surgery; major clinical study; histopathology; cancer patient; neoadjuvant therapy; cancer staging; follow up; lymph node metastasis; lymph node dissection; lymph nodes; lymphatic metastasis; neoplasm staging; isosulfan blue; lymphoscintigraphy; sentinel lymph node; lymph node excision; sentinel lymph node biopsy; breast cancer; mastectomy; tumor differentiation; cohort analysis; pathology; breast neoplasms; minimal residual disease; intraoperative period; breast tumor; lymph node; mixed tumor; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; frozen section; paget nipple disease; lymphadenopathy; carcinoma, ductal, breast; axillary lymph node dissection; carcinoma, lobular; technetium sulfur colloid tc 99m; lobular carcinoma; procedures; lymph vessel metastasis; sentinel lymph node metastasis; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer; humans; human; female; article; breast ductal carcinoma; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer; hormone receptor negative breast cancer; hormone receptor-positive, her2-negative breast cancer; lymph node clipping
Journal Title: Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume: 29
Issue: 10
ISSN: 1068-9265
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2022-10-01
Start Page: 6133
End Page: 6139
Language: English
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12240-6
PUBMED: 35902495
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10109537
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 3 October 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Andrea Veronica Barrio
    134 Barrio
  2. Monica Morrow
    772 Morrow
  3. Giacomo Montagna
    100 Montagna
  4. Minna Kyu Lee
    23 Lee