Patient-reported outcomes from a randomized trial of neoadjuvant atezolizumab-chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer Journal Article


Authors: Barrios, C. H.; Saji, S.; Harbeck, N.; Zhang, H.; Jung, K. H.; Patel, S.; Patel, S.; Duc, A. N.; Liste-Hermoso, M.; Chui, S. Y.; Mittendorf, E. A.
Article Title: Patient-reported outcomes from a randomized trial of neoadjuvant atezolizumab-chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer
Abstract: Patient-reported outcomes data assessing patients’ experience of immunotherapy treatment burden in potentially curable early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are lacking. These patient-reported data inform clinical benefit and decision-making for adding atezolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage TNBC. IMpassion031 (NCT03197935) randomly assigned patients with stage II/III TNBC (T2–T4d primary tumors) to 5 cycles (4 weeks/cycle) of every 2-week neoadjuvant atezolizumab 840 mg or placebo with weekly nab-paclitaxel (3 cycles) followed by every 2-week dose-dense doxorubicin+cyclophosphamide (2 cycles). After surgery, the atezolizumab-chemotherapy arm received atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks (11 cycles). The placebo-chemotherapy arm was observed under standard of care. To assess treatment burden from the patients’ perspective, which comprised measures of the treatment-related impact on patients’ functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), as well as patients’ experience of treatment-related symptoms plus their associated bother, patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G single-item GP5. Predefined secondary endpoints included mean and mean change from baseline values in the QLQ-C30 function (role and physical) and global health status/quality of life scales. Exploratory endpoints included mean and mean change from baseline in treatment-related symptoms, and treatment side effect bother. Mean physical, role function, and HRQoL were similar between arms at baseline and throughout treatment. In the neoadjuvant period, both arms exhibited clinically meaningful declines of similar magnitude from baseline in physical, role function, and HRQoL, and reported similar treatment side effect to bother at each visit. Improved pathologic complete response from adding atezolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage TNBC occurred without imposing additional treatment burden on patients. © 2022, The Author(s).
Keywords: cancer chemotherapy; controlled study; treatment response; cancer surgery; primary tumor; major clinical study; overall survival; fatigue; bevacizumab; doxorubicin; placebo; drug efficacy; drug safety; capecitabine; paclitaxel; cancer patient; cancer staging; follow up; quality of life; breast cancer; randomized controlled trial; maintenance therapy; cyclophosphamide; histology; dyspnea; health care quality; questionnaire; insomnia; health status; immunotherapy; nausea and vomiting; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; double blind procedure; rankin scale; personalized medicine; programmed death 1 ligand 1; cyclin dependent kinase 6; global health; triple negative breast cancer; patient-reported outcome; social interaction; body weight loss; dose densification; human; article; atezolizumab; functional assessment of cancer therapy general; european organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30; bothersomeness
Journal Title: npj Breast Cancer
Volume: 8
ISSN: 2374-4677
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group  
Date Published: 2022-09-19
Start Page: 108
Language: English
DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00457-3
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC9485121
PUBMED: 36123366
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 3 October 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Hong Zhang
    54 Zhang