Outcomes and molecular features of brain metastasis in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma Journal Article


Authors: Tsai, C.; Nguyen, B.; Luthra, A.; Chou, J. F.; Feder, L.; Tang, L. H.; Strong, V. E.; Molena, D.; Jones, D. R.; Coit, D. G.; Ilson, D. H.; Ku, G. Y.; Cowzer, D.; Cadley, J.; Capanu, M.; Schultz, N.; Beal, K.; Moss, N. S.; Janjigian, Y. Y.; Maron, S. B.
Article Title: Outcomes and molecular features of brain metastasis in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
Abstract: Key Points: Question: What clinical features are associated with survival in patients with brain metastasis from gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma? Findings: In this cohort study of 68 patients with brain metastasis from gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, median survival was 8.7 months from diagnosis, with overall survival rates of 35% at 1 year and 24% at 2 years. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or greater and who received no surgery or radiotherapy had significantly decreased survival in a multivariable analysis. Meaning: These findings suggest that modern treatment approaches are associated with improved prognosis for patients with brain metastasis from gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. This cohort study characterizes the clinical and genomic features of patients with brain metastasis from gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and evaluates the associations of surgical resection and radiotherapy use with survival. Importance: Brain metastasis (BrM) in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) is a rare and poorly understood phenomenon associated with poor prognosis. Objectives: To examine the clinical and genomic features of patients with BrM from GEA and evaluate factors associated with survival. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-institution retrospective cohort study, 68 patients with BrM from GEA diagnosed between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2020, were identified via review of billing codes and imaging reports from the electronic medical record with follow-up through November 3, 2021. Genomic data were derived from the Memorial Sloan Kettering–Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets clinical sequencing platform. Exposures: Treatment with BrM resection and/or radiotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival after BrM diagnosis. Results: Sixty-eight patients (median age at diagnosis, 57.4 years [IQR, 49.8-66.4 years]; 59 [86.8%] male; 55 [85.9%] White) participated in the study. A total of 57 (83.8%) had primary tumors in the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Median time from initial diagnosis to BrM diagnosis was 16.9 months (IQR, 8.5-27.7 months). Median survival from BrM diagnosis was 8.7 months (95% CI, 5.5-11.5 months). Overall survival was 35% (95% CI, 25%-48%) at 1 year and 24% (95% CI, 16%-37%) at 2 years. In a multivariable analysis, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or greater (hazard ratio [HR], 4.66; 95% CI, 1.47-14.70; P =.009) and lack of surgical or radiotherapeutic intervention (HR, 7.71; 95% CI, 2.01-29.60; P =.003) were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, whereas 3 or more extracranial sites of disease (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.64-5.29; P =.25) and 4 or more BrMs (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.93-4.98; P =.07) were not statistically significant. A total of 31 patients (45.6%) had ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)–positive tumors, and alterations in ERBB2 were enriched in BrM relative to primary tumors (8 [47.1%] vs 7 [20.6%], P =.05), as were alterations in PTPRT (7 [41.2%] vs 4 [11.8%], P =.03). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that that a notable proportion of patients with BrM from GEA achieve survival exceeding 1 and 2 years from BrM diagnosis, a more favorable prognosis than previously reported. Good performance status and treatment with combination surgery and radiotherapy were associated with the best outcomes. ERBB2 positivity and amplification as well as PTPRT alterations were enriched in BrM tissue compared with primary tumors; therefore, further study should be pursued to identify whether these variables represent genomic risk factors for BrM development.
Journal Title: JAMA Network Open
Volume: 5
Issue: 8
ISSN: 2574-3805
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2022-08-01
Start Page: e2228083
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28083
PROVIDER: EBSCOhost
PROVIDER: cinahl
PMCID: PMC9403772
PUBMED: 36001319
DOI/URL:
Notes: Accession Number: 158743066 -- Entry Date: In Process -- Revision Date: 20220830 -- Publication Type: Article. -- Source: Cinahl
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Joanne Fu-Lou Chou
    331 Chou
  2. Geoffrey Yuyat Ku
    230 Ku
  3. Kathryn Beal
    221 Beal
  4. Marinela Capanu
    385 Capanu
  5. Yelena Yuriy Janjigian
    394 Janjigian
  6. Laura Hong Tang
    447 Tang
  7. Vivian Strong
    264 Strong
  8. Daniel Coit
    542 Coit
  9. David H Ilson
    433 Ilson
  10. Nikolaus D Schultz
    486 Schultz
  11. David Randolph Jones
    417 Jones
  12. Daniela   Molena
    270 Molena
  13. Nelson Moss
    88 Moss
  14. Bastien Nguyen
    31 Nguyen
  15. Steven Maron
    102 Maron
  16. Anisha Luthra
    26 Luthra
  17. Lara Feder
    5 Feder
  18. Darren Cowzer
    29 Cowzer
  19. John Cadley
    4 Cadley