Primary characteristics and outcomes of newly diagnosed low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma Journal Article


Authors: Smith, E. S.; Jansen, C.; Miller, K. M.; Chiang, S.; Alektiar, K. M.; Hensley, M. L.; Mueller, J. J.; Abu-Rustum, N. R.; Leitao, M. M. Jr
Article Title: Primary characteristics and outcomes of newly diagnosed low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma
Abstract: Objective To assess potential predictive variables for nodal metastasis and survival outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Methods We performed a single-institution, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma who presented between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 2019 and underwent hysterectomy at our institution or presented within 3 months of primary surgery elsewhere before recurrence. Patients who presented to our institution only at recurrence were excluded. Patients with <3 months of follow-up were excluded from survival analyses. Results We identified 127 consecutive patients for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 48 years (range 19-88 years); 91 (74.6%) of 127 were pre-menopausal; and 74 (58.3%) of 127 had uterine-confined, stage I tumors. Of 56 patients (44.1%) who underwent lymph node sampling, 10 (17.9%) had nodal metastasis. Of the 10 with nodal metastasis, 1 (10%) did not have lymphadenopathy or extra-uterine disease, 4 (40%) had lymphadenopathy only, 1 (10%) had extra-uterine disease only, and 4 (40%) had both. Among the 29 patients without apparent extra-uterine disease or gross lymphadenopathy, there was one occult lymph node metastasis (3.4%). Gross lymphadenopathy at time of surgery was predictive for lymph node metastasis (p<0.001). Median follow-up was 69 months (range 4-336) for the 95 patients included in the survival analyses. The 5-year progression-free survival and disease-specific survival rates were 79.8% and 90.8%, respectively. Patients with stage I tumors had longer progression-free survival than those with stage II-IV disease (p<0.001); there was no difference in disease-specific survival (p=0.63). Post-operative observation versus adjuvant therapy with hormone blockade or radiation therapy did not result in progression-free survival differences for stage I or completely resected stage II-IV disease (p=0.50 and p=0.81, respectively). Similarly, there was no disease-specific survival difference for completely resected stage II-IV disease (p=0.3). Conclusions Lymph node dissection in patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma should be reserved for those with clinically suspicious lymphadenopathy. Disease stage correlated with progression-free survival but not disease-specific survival. Post-operative therapy did not improve progression-free survival or disease-specific survival. ©
Keywords: adult; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; retrospective studies; young adult; cancer staging; lymph node metastasis; hysterectomy; lymph node dissection; endometrial neoplasms; lymphatic metastasis; neoplasm staging; lymph node excision; neoplasm recurrence, local; pathology; retrospective study; sarcoma; tumor recurrence; surgery; endometrium tumor; lymphadenopathy; endometrium sarcoma; surgical oncology; sarcoma, endometrial stromal; very elderly; humans; human; female
Journal Title: International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Volume: 32
Issue: 7
ISSN: 1048-891X
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2022-07-01
Start Page: 882
End Page: 890
Language: English
DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003383
PUBMED: 35641004
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC9256804
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 September 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Kaled M Alektiar
    333 Alektiar
  2. Mario Leitao
    575 Leitao
  3. Martee L Hensley
    289 Hensley
  4. Jennifer Jean Mueller
    186 Mueller
  5. Sarah   Chiang
    146 Chiang
  6. Evan Scott Smith
    23 Smith
  7. Kathryn Miller
    21 Miller
  8. Corinne Nicole Jansen
    1 Jansen