Expression of novel neuroendocrine markers in breast carcinomas: A study of INSM1, ASCL1, and POU2F3 Journal Article


Authors: Zhong, E.; Pareja, F.; Hanna, M. G.; Jungbluth, A. A.; Rekhtman, N.; Brogi, E.
Article Title: Expression of novel neuroendocrine markers in breast carcinomas: A study of INSM1, ASCL1, and POU2F3
Abstract: INSM1, ASCL1, and POU2F3 are novel transcription factors involved in neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation of neoplasms in several organs, but data on their expression in breast carcinomas (BCs) are limited. We retrospectively evaluated the expression of these markers in a series of 97 BCs (58 with NE morphology and 39 with otherwise uncommon morphology) tested prospectively using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Nuclear staining in >50% of the cells was used as the positive cut-off. Thirty-two of the 97 BCs (33%) were INSM1-positive. INSM1-positivity correlated significantly with histologic type and presence of stromal mucin. INSM1 also correlated with synaptophysin and chromogranin, established markers of NE differentiation (P <.0001 and P =.0023, respectively). In BC with NE morphology, the expression of INSM1 supported NE differentiation, and INSM1 was more specific than synaptophysin and more sensitive and specific than chromogranin. INSM1 was the most expressed NE marker in 17 BCs. INSM1-positive BCs included 56% of solid papillary BCs, 88% of BCs with solid papillary features, and 75% of high-grade NE carcinomas. Of 35 BCs tested for POU2F3 and ASCL1, only 1 and 4 cases were positive, respectively. Our results show that INSM1 is a sensitive marker of NE differentiation in BC and should be included with synaptophysin and chromogranin in the IHC panel used to evaluate NE differentiation in BC with NE morphology. ASCL1 and POU2F3 are uncommon in BC and their routine assessment is not warranted. © 2022
Keywords: breast cancer; neuroendocrine; ascl1; pou2f3; insm1; hash-1
Journal Title: Human Pathology
Volume: 127
ISSN: 0046-8177
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2022-09-01
Start Page: 102
End Page: 111
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.06.003
PUBMED: 35690220
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10227884
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 September 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Natasha Rekhtman
    424 Rekhtman
  2. Edi Brogi
    515 Brogi
  3. Achim Jungbluth
    454 Jungbluth
  4. Matthew George Hanna
    101 Hanna
  5. Elaine Zhong
    3 Zhong