Long-term outcomes of parenchyma-sparing and oncologic resections in patients with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors <3 cm in a large multicenter cohort Journal Article


Authors: Bolm, L.; Nebbia, M.; Wei, A. C.; Zureikat, A. H.; Fernández-del Castillo, C.; Zheng, J.; Pulvirenti, A.; Javed, A. A.; Sekigami, Y.; Petruch, N.; Qadan, M.; Lillemoe, K. D.; He, J.; Ferrone, C. R.; and the PAncreatic Neuroendocrine Disease Alliance (PANDA)
Article Title: Long-term outcomes of parenchyma-sparing and oncologic resections in patients with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors <3 cm in a large multicenter cohort
Abstract: Introduction: The role of parenchyma-sparing resections (PSR) and lymph node dissection in small (&lt;3 cm) nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) is unlikely to be studied in a prospective randomized clinical trial. By combining data from 4 high-volume pancreatic centers we compared postoperative and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent PSR with patients who underwent oncologic resections. Methods: Retrospective review of prospectively collected clinicopathologic data of patients who underwent pancreatectomy between 2000 and 2021 was collected from 4 high-volume institutions. PSR and lymph node-sparing resections (enucleation and central pancreatectomy) were compared to those who underwent oncologic resections with lymphadenectomy (pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy). Statistical testing was performed using χ2test and t test, survival estimates with Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Of 810 patients with small sporadic nonfunctional PNETs, 121 (14.9%) had enucleations, 100 (12.3%) had central pancreatectomies, and 589 (72.7%) patients underwent oncologic resections. The median age was 59 years and 48.2% were female with a median tumor size of 2.5 cm. After case-control matching for tumor size, 221 patients were selected in each group. Patients with PSR were more likely to undergo minimally invasive operations (32.6% vs 13.6%, P&lt;0.001), had less intraoperative blood loss (358 vs 511 ml, P&lt;0.001) and had shorter operative times (180 vs 330 minutes, P&lt;0.001) than patients undergoing oncologic resections. While the mean number of lymph nodes harvested was lower for PSR (n=1.4 vs n=9.9, P&lt;0.001), the mean number of positive lymph nodes was equivalent to oncologic resections (n=1.1 vs n=0.9, P=0.808). Although the rate of all postoperative complications was similar for PSR and oncologic resections (38.5% vs 48.2%, P=0.090), it was higher for central pancreatectomies (38.5% vs 56.6%, P=0.003). Long-term median disease-free survival (190.5 vs 195.2 months, P=0.506) and overall survival (197.9 vs 192.6 months, P=0.372) were comparable. Of the 810 patients 136 (16.7%) had no lymph nodes resected. These patients experienced less blood loss, shorter operations (P&lt;0.001), and lower postoperative complication rates as compared to patients who had lymphadenectomies (39.7% vs 56.9%, P=0.008). Median disease-free survival (197.1 vs 191.9 months, P=0.837) and overall survival (200 vs 195.1 months, P=0.827) were similar for patients with no lymph nodes resected and patients with negative lymph nodes (N0) after lymphadenectomy. Conclusion: In small &lt;3 cm nonfunctional PNETs, PSRs and lymph node-sparing resections are associated with lower blood loss, shorter operative times, and lower complication rates when compared to oncologic resections, and have similar long-term oncologic outcomes. © 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
Keywords: lymphadenectomy; pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; oncologic resection; parenchyma-sparing resection
Journal Title: Annals of Surgery
Volume: 276
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0003-4932
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2022-09-01
Start Page: 522
End Page: 531
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005559
PUBMED: 35758433
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC9388557
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 September 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Alice Chia-Chi Wei
    197 Wei