ERBB2 amplification status in 67 salivary duct carcinomas assessed by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and targeted exome sequencing Journal Article


Authors: Ferguson, D. C.; Momeni Boroujeni, A.; Zheng, T.; Mohanty, A. S.; Ho, A. L.; Arcila, M. E.; Ross, D. S.; Dogan, S.
Article Title: ERBB2 amplification status in 67 salivary duct carcinomas assessed by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and targeted exome sequencing
Abstract: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is an aggressive salivary gland malignancy with poor survival. Approximately 30% SDC harbor HER2 amplification and response to trastuzumab has been reported. However, a systematic approach for HER2 status assessment in this tumor type has not been established. A total of 67 tumor samples were evaluated for HER2 protein overexpression or ERBB2 gene amplification using at least 2 methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and/or targeted exome next-generation sequencing (NGS). NGS assessed ERBB2 copy number fold change (FC) and total copy number (TCN). HER2 status was first determined by IHC/FISH according to the 2018 ASCO/CAP breast cancer guidelines. FISH results, the “gold standard”, were compared with the NGS results. All (15/15) IHC positive, 35% (6/17) equivocal, and no (0/19) IHC negative SDC were HER2 amplified by FISH. HER2 FISH signal/cell showed a good correlation with FC (Spearman correlation: 0.708, R2: 0.501, p < 0.0001) and TCN (Spearman correlation: 0.763, R2: 0.582, p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristics curve estimation showed an area under curve (AUC) of 0.975 for ERBB2 FC. FC cutoff of ≥1.8 corresponded to an accuracy of 95.2% for ERBB2 amplification (Youden’s index: 0.84, sensitivity: 89.47%, specificity: 100%). FC < 1.3 could be reliably classified as ERBB2 not amplified and FC ≥ 1.3 and <1.8 as equivocal. TCN estimation showed AUC of 0.981. TCN cutoff of >6.0 corresponded to an accuracy of 92% for HER2 amplification (Youden’s index: 0.81, sensitivity: 81.2%, specificity: 100%). TCN < 4 could be reliably classified as ERBB2 not amplified and TCN ≥ 4.0 and ≤6.0 as equivocal. FC and TCN were binarized with respective cutoffs of ≥1.8 and ≥6.0 and the proportion of agreement with FISH were 95% and 92%, respectively. The assessment of ERBB2 copy number by NGS is accurate and reliable with FC or TCN nearly equivalent to FISH in identifying HER2 amplified SDC. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology.
Keywords: immunohistochemistry; controlled study; human tissue; protein expression; major clinical study; genetics; area under the curve; comparative study; cancer diagnosis; diagnostic accuracy; gold standard; sensitivity and specificity; metabolism; in situ hybridization, fluorescence; breast cancer; gene amplification; epidermal growth factor receptor 2; cohort analysis; practice guideline; pathology; breast neoplasms; tumor marker; fluorescence in situ hybridization; algorithm; breast tumor; receptor, erbb-2; salivary gland tumor; salivary gland neoplasms; heterozygosity loss; gene dosage; paget nipple disease; correlational study; receiver operating characteristic; carcinoma, ductal; copy number variation; erbb2 protein, human; antibody labeling; salivary duct carcinoma; salivary gland duct; procedures; exome; high throughput sequencing; youden index; allelic imbalance; humans; human; female; article; mcnemar test; whole exome sequencing; biomarkers, tumor; salivary ducts
Journal Title: Modern Pathology
Volume: 35
Issue: 7
ISSN: 0893-3952
Publisher: Nature Research  
Date Published: 2022-07-01
Start Page: 895
End Page: 902
Language: English
DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00999-0
PUBMED: 34963694
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10363285
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 August 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Snjezana Dogan
    189 Dogan
  2. Alan Loh Ho
    239 Ho
  3. Maria Eugenia Arcila
    666 Arcila
  4. Dara Stacy Ross
    145 Ross
  5. Tao Zheng
    10 Zheng
  6. Abhinita Subhadarshin Mohanty
    39 Mohanty