Reply to Benjamin Davies, Keith Kowalczyk RE: Zachary Klaassen, Emily Vertosick, Andrew J. Vickers, et al. Optimal dissemination of scientific manuscripts via social media: A prospective trial comparing visual abstracts versus key figures in consecutive original manuscripts. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.041 Correspondence


Authors: Klaassen, Z.; Catto, J. W. F.; Vickers, A. J.; Cooperberg, M. R.; Kutikov, A.
Title: Reply to Benjamin Davies, Keith Kowalczyk RE: Zachary Klaassen, Emily Vertosick, Andrew J. Vickers, et al. Optimal dissemination of scientific manuscripts via social media: A prospective trial comparing visual abstracts versus key figures in consecutive original manuscripts. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.041
Keywords: prospective study; prospective studies; letter; sensitivity analysis; publication; peer review; information dissemination; scientific literature; social media; abstract report; humans; human
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 82
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2022-07-01
Start Page: e12
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.001
PUBMED: 35428508
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Letter -- Export Date: 1 July 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Andrew J Vickers
    880 Vickers