Effects of tumor mutational burden and gene alterations associated with radiation response on outcomes of postoperative radiation therapy in non-small cell lung cancer Journal Article


Authors: Shaverdian, N.; Shepherd, A. F.; Li, X.; Offin, M.; Lengel, H. B.; Gelblum, D. Y.; Wu, A. J.; Simone, C. B. 2nd; Rimner, A.; Jones, D. R.; Chaft, J. E.; Riaz, N.; Gomez, D. R.
Article Title: Effects of tumor mutational burden and gene alterations associated with radiation response on outcomes of postoperative radiation therapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Abstract: Purpose: Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improves locoregional outcomes, but recent randomized data do not support its unselected use. We assessed if tumor mutational burden (TMB) and mutations in genes associated with radiation sensitivity can select patients for PORT. Methods and Materials: Patients with resected NSCLC treated with and without PORT who underwent tumor genomic profiling were examined. The incidence of locoregional failures (LRFs) in patients with deleterious mutations in DNA damage response and repair (DDR) genes and genes associated with radiation resistance (KEAP1/NFE2L2/STK11/PIK3CA) were investigated. Cox modeling and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis assessed the relationship between TMB and locoregional control (LRC). Results: Eighty-nine patients with NSCLC treated with PORT were analyzed, with a 2-year LRF rate of 19% (95% confidence interval, 10%-27%). Among patients treated with PORT, those with mutations in radiation resistance genes (n = 16 [18%]) had significantly more LRFs than patients without mutations (2-year LRF rate: 60% vs 11%; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, radiation-resistance mutations were associated with LRF after PORT (hazard ratio, 7.42; P < .001). Patients with mutations identified in DDR genes (n = 15 [17%]) had significantly improved LRC (P = .048) and no LRF events after PORT. On multivariate analysis, a higher TMB was associated with improved LRC after PORT (hazard ratio, 0.86; P = .01), and TMB was associated with PORT outcomes (area under ROC curve, 0.67-0.77). These genomic markers were not similarly associated with LRF in patients not treated with PORT. Conclusions: The data suggest that patients with radiation-resistance gene alterations may derive minimal benefit from PORT, whereas patients with high TMB and/or alterations in DDR genes may benefit from PORT and be suited for future precision-RT strategies. Prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
Keywords: genetics; mutation; prospective study; prospective studies; metabolism; genes; carcinoma, non-small-cell lung; lung neoplasms; radiotherapy; patient monitoring; tumor marker; lung tumor; radiation effects; tumors; genomics; dna damage response; locoregional control; multi variate analysis; multivariant analysis; biological organs; diseases; non small cell lung cancer; damage repair; hazards; failure rate; transcription factor nrf2; postoperative radiation therapy; radiation resistance; kelch like ech associated protein 1; humans; human; biomarkers, tumor; nf-e2-related factor 2; resistance genes; kelch-like ech-associated protein 1
Journal Title: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Volume: 113
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0360-3016
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2022-06-01
Start Page: 335
End Page: 344
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.02.014
PUBMED: 35157996
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC9976944
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 June 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Daphna Y Gelblum
    227 Gelblum
  2. Nadeem Riaz
    415 Riaz
  3. Daniel R Gomez
    237 Gomez
  4. Jamie Erin Chaft
    289 Chaft
  5. Andreas Rimner
    524 Rimner
  6. Abraham Jing-Ching Wu
    400 Wu
  7. David Randolph Jones
    417 Jones
  8. Michael David Offin
    170 Offin
  9. Annemarie Fernandes Shepherd
    103 Shepherd
  10. Charles Brian Simone
    190 Simone
  11. Xingzhe Li
    16 Li
  12. Harry Benjamin Lengel
    11 Lengel