Higher risk tumor features are not associated with higher nodal stage in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer Journal Article


Authors: Ye, L.; Rünger, D.; Angarita, S. A.; Hadaya, J.; Baker, J. L.; Lee, M. K.; Thompson, C. K.; Attai, D. J.; DiNome, M. L.
Article Title: Higher risk tumor features are not associated with higher nodal stage in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer
Abstract: Introduction: Studies support omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with sentinel node-positive disease, with ALND recommended for patients who present with clinically positive nodes. Here, we evaluate patient and tumor characteristics and pathologic nodal stage of patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) breast cancer who undergo ALND to determine if differences exist based on nodal presentation. Materials and methods: Retrospective chart review from 2010 to 2019 defined three groups of patients with ER + breast cancer who underwent ALND for positive nodes: SLN + (positive node identified at SLN biopsy), cNUS (abnormal preoperative US and biopsy), and cNpalp (palpable adenopathy). Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or presented with axillary recurrence were excluded. Results: Of 191 patients, 94 were SLN + , 40 were cNUS, and 57 were cNpalp. Patients with SLN + compared with cNpalp were younger (56 vs 64 years, p < 0.01), more often pre-menopausal (41% vs 14%, p < 0.01), and White (65% vs 39%, p = 0.01) with more tumors that were low-grade (36% vs 8%, p < 0.01). Rates of PR + (p = 0.16), levels of Ki67 expression (p = 0.07) and LVI (p = 0.06) did not differ significantly among groups. Of patients with SLN + disease, 64% had pN1 disease compared to 38% of cNUS (p = 0.1) and 40% of cNpalp (p = 0.01). On univariable analysis, tumor size (p = 0.01) and histology (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with pN1 disease, with size remaining an independent predictor on multivariable analysis (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Historically, higher risk features have been attributed to patients with clinically positive nodes precluding omission of ALND, but when restricting evaluation to patients with ER + breast cancer, only tumor size is associated with higher nodal stage. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Keywords: retrospective studies; lymph node metastasis; lymph node dissection; lymphatic metastasis; lymph node excision; sentinel lymph node biopsy; breast cancer; pathology; breast neoplasms; retrospective study; breast tumor; receptors, estrogen; axilla; estrogen receptor; axillary lymph node dissection; sentinel node biopsy; nodal stage; humans; human; female; clinically node-positive; palpable adenopathy
Journal Title: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume: 193
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0167-6806
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2022-06-01
Start Page: 429
End Page: 436
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06581-9
PUBMED: 35389189
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 June 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Minna Kyu Lee
    24 Lee