Results from a first-in-human phase I study of siremadlin (HDM201) in patients with advanced wild-type TP53 solid tumors and acute leukemia Journal Article


Authors: Stein, E. M.; DeAngelo, D. J.; Chromik, J.; Chatterjee, M.; Bauer, S.; Lin, C. C.; Suarez, C.; de Vos, F.; Steeghs, N.; Cassier, P. A.; Tai, D.; Kiladjian, J. J.; Yamamoto, N.; Mous, R.; Esteve, J.; Minami, H.; Ferretti, S.; Guerreiro, N.; Meille, C.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Pereira, B.; Mariconti, L.; Halilovic, E.; Fabre, C.; Carpio, C.
Article Title: Results from a first-in-human phase I study of siremadlin (HDM201) in patients with advanced wild-type TP53 solid tumors and acute leukemia
Abstract: Purpose: This phase I, dose-escalation study investigated the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) of siremadlin, a p53-MDM2 inhibitor, in patients with wild-type TP53 advanced solid or hematologic cancers. Patients and Methods: Initial dosing regimens were: 1A (day 1; 21-day cycle; dose 12.5-350 mg) and 2A (days 1-14; 28-day cycle; dose 1-20 mg). Alternative regimens included 1B (days 1 and 8; 28-day cycle) and 2C (days 1-7; 28-day cycle). The primary endpoint was incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during cycle 1. Results: Overall, 115 patients with solid tumors and 93 with hematologic malignancies received treatment. DLTs occurred in 8/92 patients with solid tumors and 10/53 patients with hematologic malignancies. In solid tumors, an RDE of 120 mg was defined in 1B. In hematologic tumors, RDEs were defined in 1A: 250 mg, 1B: 120 mg, and 2C: 45 mg. More patients with hematologic malignancies compared with solid tumors experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (71% vs. 45%), most commonly resulting from myelosuppression. These were more frequent and severe in patients with hematologic malignancies; 22 patients exhibited tumor lysis syndrome. Overall response rates at the RDEs were 10.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.2-27.4] in solid tumors and 4.2% (95% CI, 0.1-21.1), 20% (95% CI, 4.3-48.1), and 22.2% (95% CI, 8.6-42.3) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 1B, 1A, and 2C, respectively. Conclusions: A common safety profile was identified and preliminary activity was noted, particularly in AML. Comprehensive investigation of dosing regimens yielded recommended doses/regimens for future combination studies.
Keywords: inhibitor; amplification; p53; acute myeloid-leukemia; oncoprotein mdm2; idasanutlin
Journal Title: Clinical Cancer Research
Volume: 28
Issue: 5
ISSN: 1078-0432
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research  
Date Published: 2022-03-01
Start Page: 870
End Page: 881
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000767276500001
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-21-1295
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 34862243
PMCID: PMC9377734
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Eytan Moshe Stein
    342 Stein