Spatial stability of functional networks: A measure to assess the robustness of graph-theoretical metrics to spatial errors related to brain parcellation Journal Article


Authors: Bottino, F.; Lucignani, M.; Pasquini, L.; Mastrogiovanni, M.; Gazzellini, S.; Ritrovato, M.; Longo, D.; Figà-Talamanca, L.; Rossi Espagnet, M. C.; Napolitano, A.
Article Title: Spatial stability of functional networks: A measure to assess the robustness of graph-theoretical metrics to spatial errors related to brain parcellation
Abstract: There is growing interest in studying human brain connectivity and in modelling the brain functional structure as a network. Brain network creation requires parcellation of the cerebral cortex to define nodes. Parcellation might be affected by possible errors due to inter- and intra-subject variability as a consequence of brain structural and physiological characteristics and shape variations related to ageing and diseases, acquisition noise, and misregistration. These errors could induce a knock-on effect on network measure variability. The aim of this study was to investigate spatial stability, a measure of functional connectivity variations induced by parcellation errors. We simulated parcellation variability with random small spatial changes and evaluated its effects on twenty-seven graph-theoretical measures. The study included subjects from three public online datasets. Two brain parcellations were performed using FreeSurfer with geometric atlases. Starting from these, 100 new parcellations were created by increasing the area of 30% of parcels, reducing the area of neighbour parcels, with a rearrangement of vertices. fMRI data were filtered with linear regression, CompCor, and motion correction. Adjacency matrices were constructed with 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 thresholds. Differences in spatial stability between datasets, atlases, and threshold were evaluated. The higher spatial stability resulted for Characteristic-path-length, Density, Transitivity, and Closeness-centrality, and the lower spatial stability resulted for Bonacich and Katz. Multivariate analysis showed a significant effect of atlas, datasets, and thresholds. Katz and Bonacich centrality, which was subject to larger variations, can be considered an unconventional graph measure, poorly implemented in the clinical field and not yet investigated for reliability assessment. Spatial stability (SS) is affected by threshold, and it decreases with increasing threshold for several measures. Moreover, SS seems to depend on atlas choice and scanning parameters. Our study highlights the importance of paying close attention to possible parcellation-related spatial errors, which may affect the reliability of functional connectivity measures. Copyright © 2022 Bottino, Lucignani, Pasquini, Mastrogiovanni, Gazzellini, Ritrovato, Longo, Figà-Talamanca, Rossi Espagnet and Napolitano.
Keywords: fmri; functional; stability; brain connectivity; graph-theoretical measures; parcellation
Journal Title: Frontiers in Neuroscience
Volume: 15
ISSN: 1662-4548
Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.  
Date Published: 2022-02-18
Start Page: 736524
Language: English
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.736524
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8894326
PUBMED: 35250432
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 April 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors