Navigating a newly diagnosed cancer through clinician-facilitated discussions of health-related patient values: A qualitative analysis Journal Article


Authors: Lynch, K. A.; Bernal, C.; Romano, D. R.; Shin, P.; Nelson, J. E.; Okpako, M.; Anderson, K.; Cruz, E.; Desai, A. V.; Klimek, V. M.; Epstein, A. S.
Article Title: Navigating a newly diagnosed cancer through clinician-facilitated discussions of health-related patient values: A qualitative analysis
Abstract: Background: Advance care planning, the process through which patient values and goals are explored and documented, is a core quality indicator in cancer care. However, patient values are predominantly elicited at the end of life; patient values earlier in serious illness are not clearly delineated. The objective of this analysis is to assess the content of patient-verified summaries of health-related values among newly diagnosed cancer outpatients in order to develop a theoretical framework to guide future values discussions and optimize person-centered oncologic care. Methods: Values summaries among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were extracted from the medical record. Modified grounded theory analysis included interdisciplinary team coding of values summaries to identify key domains; code categorization; and identification of thematic constructs during successive consensus meetings. A final round of coding stratified themes by disease type. Results: Analysis of 128 patient values summary documents from 67 patients (gastrointestinal [GI] cancers, n = 49; myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS], n = 18) generated 115 codes across 12 categories. Resultant themes demonstrated patients’ focus on retaining agency, personhood and interpersonal connection amidst practical and existential disruption caused by cancer. Themes coalesced into a theoretical framework with 5 sequenced constructs beginning with the cancer diagnosis, leading to 3 nesting constructs of individual identity (character), interpersonal (communication) preferences and needs, and social identity (connection), signifying sources of meaning and fulfillment. Values differences between GI cancer and MDS patients—including greater focus on normalcy, prognosis, and maintaining professional life among GI patients—reflected the distinct therapeutic options and prognoses across these disease groups. Conclusions: Patient values reflect goals of meaning-making and fulfillment through individual agency and interpersonal supports in the setting of a newly diagnosed cancer. Early, nurse-led values discussions provide important and patient-specific data that are informative and likely actionable by clinicians in the delivery of person-centered care. Values can also facilitate discussions between patients and families and clarify patient preferences. © 2022, The Author(s).
Keywords: nursing; oncology; gastrointestinal neoplasms; patient participation; communication; medical oncology; interpersonal communication; qualitative research; patient preference; qualitative; gastrointestinal tumor; advance care planning; values; cancer; humans; human
Journal Title: BMC Palliative Care
Volume: 21
ISSN: 1472-684X
Publisher: Biomed Central Ltd  
Date Published: 2022-03-06
Start Page: 29
Language: English
DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-00914-7
PUBMED: 35249532
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8898465
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 April 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Virginia Klimek
    147 Klimek
  2. Andrew Saul Epstein
    159 Epstein
  3. Judith Eve Nelson
    92 Nelson
  4. Anjali Varma Desai
    25 Desai
  5. Elizabeth Maria Cruz
    7 Cruz
  6. Danielle Rae Romano
    15 Romano
  7. Camila Bernal
    20 Bernal
  8. Molly Okpako
    7 Okpako
  9. Kathleen A Lynch
    71 Lynch
  10. Paul J. Shin
    12 Shin