Clinical outcomes with use of radiation therapy and risk of transformation in early-stage follicular lymphoma Journal Article


Authors: Sha, F.; Okwali, M.; Alperovich, A.; Caron, P. C.; Falchi, L.; Hamilton, A.; Hamlin, P. A.; Horwitz, S. M.; Joffe, E.; Khan, N.; Kumar, A.; Matasar, M. J.; Moskowitz, A. J.; Noy, A.; Owens, C.; Palomba, L. M.; Rodriguez-Rivera, I.; Straus, D.; von Keudell, G.; Zelenetz, A. D.; Yahalom, J.; Dogan, A.; Schöder, H.; Seshan, V. E.; Salles, G.; Younes, A.; Batlevi, C. L.
Article Title: Clinical outcomes with use of radiation therapy and risk of transformation in early-stage follicular lymphoma
Abstract: Between 1998 and 2009, a total of 295 patients (median age 58, 53% females) with newly diagnosed early-stage follicular lymphoma (FL) were managed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Approximately half of patients (137, 46%) underwent initial observation and half (158, 54%) immediate treatment: radiation alone (n = 108), systemic treatment alone (n = 29), or combined modality treatment (n = 21). Median follow-up was 8.4 years (range 0.3–17.2), and 10-year overall survival (OS) was 87.2%. OS was similar between initially-observed and immediately-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.67–2.36, p = 0.49). For patients receiving radiation alone, 5-year OS was 98.0%. Patients selected for systemic therapy alone had high-risk baseline features and had shorter OS than patients treated with radiation alone (HR 3.38, 95% CI 1.29–8.86, p = 0.01). Combined modality treatment did not yield superior survival compared with radiation alone (P > 0.05) but was associated with better progression-free survival (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14–0.90, p = 0.03). The rate of transformation increased steadily over time and was 4.2% at 5 years and 10.8% at 10 years. This modern-era analysis rationalized the role of initial observation in patients with early-stage FL although patients receiving radiation therapy also demonstrate excellent outcome. © 2022, The Author(s).
Journal Title: Blood Cancer Journal
Volume: 12
Issue: 2
ISSN: 2044-5385
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group  
Date Published: 2022-02-10
Start Page: 29
Language: English
DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00620-w
PUBMED: 35145059
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8831497
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 March 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Venkatraman Ennapadam Seshan
    382 Seshan
  2. Joachim Yahalom
    625 Yahalom
  3. Ariela Noy
    351 Noy
  4. Maria Lia Palomba
    415 Palomba
  5. Steven M Horwitz
    645 Horwitz
  6. Heiko Schoder
    544 Schoder
  7. Andrew D Zelenetz
    767 Zelenetz
  8. Alison Moskowitz
    339 Moskowitz
  9. Paul Hamlin
    277 Hamlin
  10. Matthew J Matasar
    289 Matasar
  11. Philip C Caron
    90 Caron
  12. David J Straus
    356 Straus
  13. Anita Kumar
    180 Kumar
  14. Connie Wing-Ching Lee Batlevi
    176 Batlevi
  15. Anas Younes
    319 Younes
  16. Ahmet Dogan
    455 Dogan
  17. Colette Ngozi Owens
    66 Owens
  18. Erel Joffe
    82 Joffe
  19. Niloufer Khan
    48 Khan
  20. Fushen Sha
    8 Sha
  21. Lorenzo Falchi
    107 Falchi
  22. Gilles Andre Salles
    269 Salles
  23. Michelle Okwali
    20 Okwali