Allogeneic transplant and CAR-T therapy after autologous transplant failure in DLBCL: A noncomparative cohort analysis Journal Article


Authors: Hamadani, M.; Gopal, A. K.; Pasquini, M.; Kim, S.; Qiu, X.; Ahmed, S.; Lazaryan, A.; Raj Bhatt, V.; Daly, A.; Lulla, P.; Ciurea, S.; Gauthier, J.; Agrawal, V.; Grover, N. S.; Lekakis, L.; Modi, D.; Dahi, P. B.; Herr, M. M.; Johnson, P. C.; Hashmi, H.; Hematti, P.; Locke, F. L.
Article Title: Allogeneic transplant and CAR-T therapy after autologous transplant failure in DLBCL: A noncomparative cohort analysis
Abstract: Allogeneic transplant (alloHCT) and chimeric antigen receptor modified (CAR)-T cell therapy are potentially cuarative options of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapsing after an autologous (auto)HCT. Although the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) prognostic model can predict outcomes of alloHCT in DLBCL after autoHCT failure, corresponding models of CAR-T treatment in similar patient populations are not available. In this noncomparative registry analysis, we report outcomes of patients with DLBCL ($18 years) undergoing a reduced intensity alloHCT or CAR-T therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel during 2012 to 2019 after a prior auto-HCT failure and apply the CIBMTR prognostic model to CAR-T recipients. A total of 584 patients were included. The 1-year relapse, nonrelapse mortality, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival for CAR-T treatment after autoHCT failure were 39.5%, 4.8%, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively. The corresponding rates in the alloHCT cohort were 26.2%, 20.0%, 65.6%, and 53.8%, respectively. The 1-year OS of alloHCT recipients classified as low-, intermediate- and high/very high-risk groups according to the CIBMTR prognostic score was 73.3%, 59.9%, and 46.3%, respectively (P = .002). The corresponding rates for low-, intermediate-, and high/very high-risk CAR-T patients were 88.4%, 76.4%, and 52.8%, respectively (P <.001). This registry analysis shows that both CAR-T and alloHCT can provide durable remissions in a subset of patients with DLBCL relapsing after a prior autoHCT. The simple CIBMTR prognostic score can be used to identify patients at high risk of treatment failure after either procedure. Evaluation of novel relapse mitigations strategies after cellular immunotherapies are warranted in these high-risk patients. © 2022 American Society of Hematology. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; treatment outcome; aged; treatment failure; major clinical study; overall survival; fludarabine; cancer recurrence; progression free survival; cohort analysis; cyclophosphamide; retrospective study; cancer mortality; high risk patient; cause of death; cancer regression; acute graft versus host disease; chronic graft versus host disease; nonmyeloablative conditioning; reduced intensity conditioning; allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; graft recipient; autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; intermediate risk patient; apheresis; diffuse large b cell lymphoma; low risk patient; cancer prognosis; human; male; female; article; chimeric antigen receptor t-cell immunotherapy; axicabtagene ciloleucel
Journal Title: Blood Advances
Volume: 6
Issue: 2
ISSN: 2473-9529
Publisher: American Society of Hematology  
Date Published: 2022-01-25
Start Page: 486
End Page: 494
Language: English
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005788
PUBMED: 34673903
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8791562
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 March 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Parastoo Bahrami Dahi
    295 Dahi