Real-world assessment of patient care and practice efficiency with the introduction of subcutaneous rituximab Journal Article


Authors: Drill, E.; Qiu, A.; Shapouri, S.; Tu My, T.; Ravelo, A.; Schade, J.; Dawson, K.; Matasar, M.
Article Title: Real-world assessment of patient care and practice efficiency with the introduction of subcutaneous rituximab
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: A subcutaneous (SC) formulation of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab (Rituxan), is approved in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Rituximab-SC (R-SC) has been associated with time and clinic resource savings vs the original intravenous formulation (R-IV). Insight into the resource implications of widening R-SC adoption in a US oncology setting is needed. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective observational analysis was conducted in adult patients with DLBCL, FL, or CLL. The primary outcome measure was chair occupancy time (difference between patient room-in and room-out times). Prescribing patterns were a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 1190 patients were analyzed (treatment time frame: pre-R-SC adoption: n = 490 [41%], pre- and post R-SC adoption: n = 189 [16%], post R-SC adoption: n = 511 [43%]). Of the patients in the post-R-SC period, 374 (73%) received R-IV, 52 (10%) received R-IV and R-SC, and 85 (17%) received R-SC. When administered, R-SC reduced combination therapy chair time vs R-IV by a mean 37% (93.2 minutes; P < .001). Monotherapy (any route) reduced chair time vs combination by a mean 35.2 minutes (P < .001), with a further 40.2-minute reduction with R-SC (P < .001), representing 62% (133.4-minute) total chair time savings vs R-IV. Doctors were more likely to prescribe R-SC to patients with FL than DLBCL. CONCLUSIONS: R-SC is associated with significantly reduced chair time vs R-IV in a US oncology setting. Widespread adoption would be expected to improve practice efficiency and patient access to care, and to reduce health care resource burden.
Keywords: united states; time factors; length of stay; injections, subcutaneous; descriptive statistics; retrospective design; health services accessibility; lymphoma, b-cell -- drug therapy; nonexperimental studies; record review; oncologic care; lymphoma, non-hodgkin's -- drug therapy; leukemia, lymphocytic, chronic -- drug therapy; administration, intravenous; human; health resource utilization; patient care -- evaluation; rituximab -- administration and dosage; organizational efficiency -- evaluation; prescribing patterns -- evaluation; crowding
Journal Title: Oncology (Norwalk)
Volume: 35
Issue: 12
ISSN: 0890-9091
Publisher: C M P Medica LLC * The Oncology Group  
Date Published: 2021-12-01
Start Page: 804
End Page: 811
Language: English
PROVIDER: EBSCOhost
PROVIDER: cinahl
DOI: 10.46883/2021.25920935
PUBMED: 35089000
DOI/URL:
Notes: Accession Number: 154164388 -- Entry Date: 20211225 -- Revision Date: 20211225 -- Publication Type: Article; research; tables/charts -- Journal Subset: Biomedical; Editorial Board Reviewed; Expert Peer Reviewed; Peer Reviewed; USA -- NLM UID: 8712059. -- Source: Cinahl
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Matthew J Matasar
    289 Matasar
  2. Esther Naomi Drill
    93 Drill
  3. Jake Ryan Schade
    4 Schade
  4. Annie Qiu
    7 Qiu