Response to rucaparib in BRCA-mutant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer identified by genomic testing in the TRITON2 study Journal Article


Authors: Loehr, A.; Patnaik, A.; Campbell, D.; Shapiro, J.; Bryce, A. H.; McDermott, R.; Sautois, B.; Vogelzang, N. J.; Bambury, R. M.; Voog, E.; Zhang, J.; Piulats, J. M.; Hussain, A.; Ryan, C. J.; Merseburger, A. S.; Daugaard, G.; Heidenreich, A.; Fizazi, K.; Higano, C. S.; Krieger, L. E.; Sternberg, C. N.; Watkins, S. P.; Despain, D.; Simmons, A. D.; Dowson, M.; Golsorkhi, T.; Chowdhury, S.; Abida, W.
Article Title: Response to rucaparib in BRCA-mutant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer identified by genomic testing in the TRITON2 study
Abstract: Purpose: The PARP inhibitor rucaparib is approved in the United States for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and a deleterious germline and/or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alteration. While sequencing of tumor tissue is considered the standard for identifying patients with BRCA alterations (BRCA(+)), plasma profiling may provide a minimally invasive option to select patients for rucaparib treatment. Here, we report dinical efficacy in patients with BRCA(+) mCRPC identified through central plasma, central tissue, or local genomic testing and enrolled in TRITON2. Patients and Methods: Patients had progressed after next-generation androgen receptor-directed and taxane-based therapies for mCRPC and had BRCA alterations identified by central sequencing of plasma and/or tissue samples or local genomic testing. Concordance of plasma/tissue BRCA status and objective response rate and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates were summarized. Results: TRITON2 enrolled 115 patients with BRCA(+) identified by central plasma (n = 34), central tissue (n = 37), or local (n = 44) testing. Plasma/tissue concordance was determined in 38 patients with paired samples and was 47% in 19 patients with a somatic BRCA alteration. No statistically significant differences were observed between objective and PSA response rates to rucaparib across the 3 assay groups. Patients unable to provide tissue samples and tested solely by plasma assay responded at rates no different from patients identified as BRCA(+) by tissue testing. Conclusions: Plasma, tissue, and local testing of mCRPC patients can be used to identify men with BRCA(+) mCRPC who can benefit from treatment with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib.
Keywords: mutation; profile; circulating tumor dna; bone-biopsy; tissue acquisition
Journal Title: Clinical Cancer Research
Volume: 27
Issue: 24
ISSN: 1078-0432
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research  
Date Published: 2021-12-15
Start Page: 6677
End Page: 6686
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000732456000001
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-21-2199
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC8678310
PUBMED: 34598946
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Wassim Abida
    154 Abida