Randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer Journal Article


Authors: Cassidy, J.; Clarke, S.; Díaz-Rubio, E.; Scheithauer, W.; Figer, A.; Wong, R.; Koski, S.; Lichinitser, M.; Yang, T. S.; Rivera, F.; Couture, F.; Sirzeen, F.; Saltz, L.
Article Title: Randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer
Abstract: Purpose To evaluate whether capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is noninferior to fluorouracil. folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Patients and Methods The initial design of this trial was a randomized, two-arm, noninferiority, phase III comparison of XELOX versus FOLFOX-4. After patient accrual had begun, the trial design was amended in 2003 after bevacizumab phase III data became available. The resulting 2 x 2 factorial design randomly assigned patients to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to also receive either bevacizumab or placebo. We report here the results of the analysis of the XELOX versus FOLFOX-4 arms. The analysis of bevacizumab versus placebo with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is reported separately. The prespecified primary end point for the noninferiority analysis was progression-free survival. Results The intent-to-treat population comprised 634 patients from the original two-arm portion of the study, plus an additional 1,400 patients after the start of the amended 2 x 2 design, for a total of 2,034 patients. The median PFS was 8.0 months in the pooled XELOX-containing arms versus 8.5 months in the FOLFOX-4-containing arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 97.5% CI, 0.93 to 1.16). The median overall survival was 19.8 months with XELOX versus 19.6 months with FOLFOX-4 (HR, 0.99; 97.5% CI, 0.88 to 1.12). FOLFOX-4 was associated with more grade 3/4 neutropenia/granulocytopenia and febrile neutropenia than XELOX, and XELOX with more grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than FOLFOX-4. Conclusion XELOX is noninferior to FOLFOX-4 as a first-line treatment for MCRC, and may be considered as a routine treatment option for appropriate patients.
Keywords: tumors; leucovorin; trial; oral capecitabine; final report
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 26
Issue: 12
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2008-04-01
Start Page: 2006
End Page: 2012
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000255054700018
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9898
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 18421053
Notes: Presented in part at the 31st European Society of Medical Oncology Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, September 29-October 3, 2006; the American Society of Clinical Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, Orlando, FL, January 19-21, 2007; and the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Chicago, IL, June 1-5, 2007 - "Source: Wos"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Leonard B Saltz
    790 Saltz