High-frequency impulse therapy for treatment of chronic back pain: A multicenter randomized controlled pilot study Journal Article


Authors: Amirdelfan, K.; Hong, M.; Tay, B.; Reddy, S.; Reddy, V.; Yang, M.; Khanna, K.; Shirvalkar, P.; Abrecht, C.; Gulati, A.
Article Title: High-frequency impulse therapy for treatment of chronic back pain: A multicenter randomized controlled pilot study
Abstract: Purpose: This study aims to examine high-frequency impulse therapy (HFIT) impact on pain and function among patients undergoing care for chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods: A pilot randomized-controlled trial of HFIT system versus sham was conducted across 5 orthopedic and pain center sites in California, USA. Thirty-six patients seeking clinical care for CLBP were randomized. Primary outcome was function measured by the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Secondary outcomes were function (Timed Up and Go [TUG] and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), pain (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]), quality of life (Patient Global Impression of Change [PGIC]), and device use. Patients were assessed at baseline and every week for 4 weeks of follow-up. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to analyze changes in each outcome. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess the effect of treatment over time. Results: The average age of subjects was 53.9 ± 15.7 (mean ± SD) years, with 12.1 ± 8.8 years of chronic low back pain. Patients who received an HFIT device had a significantly higher 6MWT score at weeks 2 [Cohen’s d (95% CI): 0.33 (0.02, 0.61)], 3 [0.32 (0.01, 0.59)] and 4 [0.31 (0.01, 0.60)], respectively, as compared to their baseline scores (p < 0.05). Patients in the treatment group had significantly lower TUG scores at week 3 [0.30 (0.04, 0.57)] and significantly lower NRS scores at weeks 2 [0.34 (0.02, 0.58)] and 4 [0.41 (0.10, 0.67)] (p < 0.05). Conclusion: A larger-scale RCT can build on the findings of this study to test whether HFIT is effective in reducing pain and improving function in CLBP patients. This study shows encouraging evidence of functional improvement and reduction in pain in subjects who used HFIT. The efficacy and minimally invasive nature of HFIT is anticipated to substantially improve the management of CLBP patients. © 2021 Amirdelfan et al. Tterms.php and incorporate t.
Keywords: adult; clinical article; controlled study; middle aged; outcome assessment; follow up; quality of life; pain; randomized controlled trial; clinical assessment; neuromodulation; pilot study; multicenter study; chronic pain; analysis of variance; non invasive procedure; rank sum test; california; pain clinic; human; male; female; article; numeric rating scale; six minute walk test; oswestry disability index; hfit; noninvasive treatment; timed up and go test
Journal Title: Journal of Pain Research
Volume: 14
ISSN: 1178-7090
Publisher: Dove Medical Press Ltd  
Date Published: 2021-01-01
Start Page: 2991
End Page: 2999
Language: English
DOI: 10.2147/jpr.S325230
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8473565
PUBMED: 34588809
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 November 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Amitabh Gulati
    146 Gulati