Comprehensive breast cancer risk assessment for CHEK2 and ATM pathogenic variant carriers incorporating a polygenic risk score and the Tyrer-Cuzick model Journal Article


Authors: Gallagher, S.; Hughes, E.; Kurian, A. W.; Domchek, S. M.; Garber, J.; Probst, B.; Morris, B.; Tshiaba, P.; Meek, S.; Rosenthal, E.; Roa, B.; Slavin, T. P.; Wagner, S.; Weitzel, J.; Gutin, A.; Lanchbury, J. S.; Robson, M.
Article Title: Comprehensive breast cancer risk assessment for CHEK2 and ATM pathogenic variant carriers incorporating a polygenic risk score and the Tyrer-Cuzick model
Abstract: PURPOSE Breast cancer risks for CHEK2 and ATM pathogenic variant (PV) carriers are modified by an 86-single nucleotide polymorphism polygenic risk score (PRS) and individual clinical factors. Here, we describe comprehensive risk prediction models for women of European ancestry combining PV status, PRS, and individual clinical variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study included deidentified clinical records from 358,095 women of European ancestry who received testing with a multigene panel (September 2013 to November 2019). Model development included CHEK2 PV carriers (n = 4,286), ATM PV carriers (n = 2,666), and women negative for other breast cancer risk gene PVs (n = 351,143). Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for familial cancer history. Risk estimates incorporating PV status, PRS, and Tyrer-Cuzick v7.02 were calculated using a Fixed-Stratified method that accounts for correlations between risk factors. Stratification of PV carriers into risk categories on the basis of remaining lifetime risk (RLR) was assessed in independent cohorts of PV carriers. RESULTS ORs for association of PV status with breast cancer were 2.01 (95% CI, 1.88 to 2.16) and 1.83 (95% CI, 1.68 to 2.00) for CHEK2 and ATM PV carriers, respectively. ORs for PRS per one standard deviation were 1.51 (95% CI, 1.37 to 1.66) and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.30 to 1.64) in CHEK2 and ATM PV carriers, respectively. Using the combined model (PRS plus Tyrer-Cuzick plus PV status), RLR was low (≤ 20%) for 24.2% of CHEK2 PV carriers, medium (20%-50%) for 63.8%, and high (. 50%) for 12.0%. Among ATM PV carriers, RLR was low for 31.5% of patients, medium for 58.5%, and high for 9.7%. CONCLUSION In CHEK2 and ATM PV carriers, risk assessment including PRS, Tyrer-Cuzick, and PV status has the potential for more precise direction of screening and prevention strategies. © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Journal Title: JCO Precision Oncology
Volume: 5
ISSN: 2473-4284
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2021-01-01
Start Page: 1073
End Page: 1081
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/po.20.00484
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8238281
PUBMED: 34322652
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 November 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Mark E Robson
    681 Robson