Introduction to artificial intelligence and machine learning for pathology Review


Authors: Harrison, J. H. Jr; Gilbertson, J. R.; Hanna, M. G.; Olson, N. H.; Seheult, J. N.; Sorace, J. M.; Stram, M. N.
Review Title: Introduction to artificial intelligence and machine learning for pathology
Abstract: Context.-Recent developments in machine learning have stimulated intense interest in software that may augment or replace human experts. Machine learning may impact pathology practice by offering new capabilities in analysis, interpretation, and outcomes prediction using images and other data. The principles of operation and management of machine learning systems are unfamiliar to pathologists, who anticipate a need for additional education to be effective as expert users and managers of the new tools. Objective.-To provide a background on machine learning for practicing pathologists, including an overview of algorithms, model development, and performance evaluation; to examine the current status of machine learning in pathology and consider possible roles and requirements for pathologists in local deployment and management of machine learning systems; and to highlight existing challenges and gaps in deployment methodology and regulation. Data Sources.-Sources include the biomedical and engineering literature, white papers from professional organizations, government reports, electronic resources, and authors' experience in machine learning. References were chosen when possible for accessibility to practicing pathologists without specialized training in mathematics, statistics, or software development. Conclusions.-Machine learning offers an array of techniques that in recent published results show substantial promise. Data suggest that human experts working with machine learning tools outperform humans or machines separately, but the optimal form for this combination in pathology has not been established. Significant questions related to the generalizability of machine learning systems, local site verification, and performance monitoring remain to be resolved before a consensus on best practices and a regulatory environment can be established. © 2021 College of American Pathologists. All rights reserved.
Keywords: consensus; prediction; government; algorithm; education; artificial intelligence; medical society; software; pathologist; human experiment; mathematics; manager; machine learning; human; article
Journal Title: Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
Volume: 145
Issue: 10
ISSN: 0003-9985
Publisher: College of American Pathologists  
Date Published: 2021-10-01
Start Page: 1228
End Page: 1254
Language: English
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0541-CP
PUBMED: 33493264
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Matthew George Hanna
    101 Hanna