A study of advanced practice provider staffing models and professional development opportunities at National Comprehensive Cancer Network member institutions Journal Article


Authors: Austin, A.; Jeffries, K.; Krause, D.; Sugalski, J.; Sharrah, K.; Gross, A.; Bowers, D.; Mulkerin, D.; Brandt, N.; Begue, A.; Bell, R.; Raczyk, C.; Pickard, T.; Johnson, D.; Dest, V.; Randall, R.; Zecha, G.; Kennedy, K.
Article Title: A study of advanced practice provider staffing models and professional development opportunities at National Comprehensive Cancer Network member institutions
Abstract: Introduction: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Best Practices Committee created an Advanced Practice Provider (APP) Workgroup to develop recommendations to support APP roles at NCCN Member Institutions. Methods: The Workgroup conducted three surveys to understand APP program structure, staffing models, and professional development opportunities at NCCN Member Institutions. Results: The total number of new and follow-up visits a 1.0 APP full-time equivalent conducts per week in shared and independent visits ranged from 11 to 97, with an average of 40 visits per week (n = 39). The type of visits APPs conduct include follow-up shared (47.2%), follow-up independent (46%), new shared (6.5%), and new independent visits (0.5%). Seventy-two percent of respondents utilize a mixed model visit type, with 15% utilizing only independent visits and 13% utilizing only shared visits (n = 39). Of the 95% of centers with APP leads, 100% indicated that leads carry administrative and clinical responsibilities (n = 20); however, results varied with respect to how this time is allocated. Professional development opportunities offered included posters, papers, and presentations (84%), leadership development (57%), research opportunities (52%), writing book chapters (19%), and other professional development activities (12%; n = 422). Twenty percent of APPs indicated that protected time to engage in development opportunities should be offered. Conclusion: As evidenced by the variability of the survey results, the field would benefit from developing standards for APPs. There is a lack of information regarding leadership structures to help support APPs, and additional research is needed. Additionally, centers should continuously assess the careerlong opportunities needed to maximize the value of oncology APPs.
Journal Title: Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology
Volume: 12
Issue: 7
ISSN: 2150-0878
Publisher: Harborside Press  
Date Published: 2021-09-01
Start Page: 717
End Page: 724
Language: English
ACCESSION: 152619750
DOI: 10.6004/jadpro.2021.12.7.5
PROVIDER: EBSCOhost
PROVIDER: cinahl
PMCID: PMC8504930
PUBMED: 34671501
DOI/URL:
Notes: Accession Number: 152619750 -- Entry Date: In Process -- Revision Date: 20210928 -- Publication Type: Article -- Journal Subset: Biomedical; USA. -- Source: Cinahl
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Aaron Michael Begue
    13 Begue