Genetic determinants of outcome in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Journal Article


Authors: Boerner, T.; Drill, E.; Pak, L. M.; Nguyen, B.; Sigel, C. S.; Doussot, A.; Shin, P.; Goldman, D. A.; Gonen, M.; Allen, P. J.; Balachandran, V. P.; Cercek, A.; Harding, J.; Solit, D. B.; Schultz, N.; Kundra, R.; Walch, H.; D'Angelica, M. I.; DeMatteo, R. P.; Drebin, J.; Kemeny, N. E.; Kingham, T. P.; Simpson, A. L.; Hechtman, J. F.; Vakiani, E.; Lowery, M. A.; Ijzermans, J. N. M.; Buettner, S.; Koerkamp, B. G.; Doukas, M.; Chandwani, R.; Jarnagin, W. R.
Article Title: Genetic determinants of outcome in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Abstract: Background and Aim Genetic alterations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) are increasingly well characterized, but their impact on outcome and prognosis remains unknown. Approach and Results This bi-institutional study of patients with confirmed iCCA (n = 412) used targeted next-generation sequencing of primary tumors to define associations among genetic alterations, clinicopathological variables, and outcome. The most common oncogenic alterations were isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1; 20%), AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (20%), tumor protein P53 (TP53; 17%), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A; 15%), breast cancer 1-associated protein 1 (15%), FGFR2 (15%), polybromo 1 (12%), and KRAS (10%). IDH1/2 mutations (mut) were mutually exclusive with FGFR2 fusions, but neither was associated with outcome. For all patients, TP53 (P < 0.0001), KRAS (P = 0.0001), and CDKN2A (P < 0.0001) alterations predicted worse overall survival (OS). These high-risk alterations were enriched in advanced disease but adversely impacted survival across all stages, even when controlling for known correlates of outcome (multifocal disease, lymph node involvement, bile duct type, periductal infiltration). In resected patients (n = 209), TP53mut (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.08-3.06; P = 0.03) and CDKN2A deletions (del; HR, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.95-5.94; P < 0.001) independently predicted shorter OS, as did high-risk clinical variables (multifocal liver disease [P P < 0.001]), whereas KRASmut (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.97-2.93; P = 0.06) trended toward statistical significance. The presence of both or neither high-risk clinical or genetic factors represented outcome extremes (median OS, 18.3 vs. 74.2 months; P < 0.001), with high-risk genetic alterations alone (median OS, 38.6 months; 95% CI, 28.8-73.5) or high-risk clinical variables alone (median OS, 37.0 months; 95% CI, 27.6-not available) associated with intermediate outcome. TP53mut, KRASmut, and CDKN2Adel similarly predicted worse outcome in patients with unresectable iCCA. CDKN2Adel tumors with high-risk clinical features were notable for limited survival and no benefit of resection over chemotherapy. Conclusions TP53, KRAS, and CDKN2A alterations were independent prognostic factors in iCCA when controlling for clinical and pathologic variables, disease stage, and treatment. Because genetic profiling can be integrated into pretreatment therapeutic decision-making, combining clinical variables with targeted tumor sequencing may identify patient subgroups with poor outcome irrespective of treatment strategy.
Keywords: chemotherapy; targets; mutations; features; phase-ii; growth; multicenter; isocitrate dehydrogenase 1; primary liver-cancer; prognosis
Journal Title: Hepatology
Volume: 74
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0270-9139
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons  
Date Published: 2021-09-01
Start Page: 1429
End Page: 1444
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000696012700026
DOI: 10.1002/hep.31829
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 33765338
PMCID: PMC8713028
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. David Solit
    778 Solit
  2. Mithat Gonen
    1028 Gonen
  3. James Joseph Harding
    250 Harding
  4. William R Jarnagin
    903 Jarnagin
  5. T Peter Kingham
    609 Kingham
  6. Efsevia Vakiani
    261 Vakiani
  7. Nancy Kemeny
    543 Kemeny
  8. Carlie Selbo Sigel
    115 Sigel
  9. Nikolaus D Schultz
    486 Schultz
  10. Debra Alyssa Goldman
    158 Goldman
  11. Esther Naomi Drill
    93 Drill
  12. Jaclyn Frances Hechtman
    212 Hechtman
  13. Ritika   Kundra
    88 Kundra
  14. Linda Ma Pak
    30 Pak
  15. Jeffrey Adam Drebin
    165 Drebin
  16. Thomas Boerner
    70 Boerner
  17. Bastien Nguyen
    31 Nguyen
  18. Henry Stuart Walch
    100 Walch
  19. Paul J. Shin
    12 Shin