Opportunities for improvement in the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for T4 breast cancer: A comparison of the U.S. and Nigeria Journal Article


Authors: Romanoff, A.; Olasehinde, O.; Goldman, D. A.; Alatise, O. I.; Constable, J.; Monu, N.; Knapp, G. C.; Odujoko, O.; Onabanjo, E.; Adisa, A. O.; Arowolo, A. O.; Omisore, A. D.; Famurewa, O. C.; Anderson, B. O.; Gemignani, M. L.; Kingham, T. P.
Article Title: Opportunities for improvement in the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for T4 breast cancer: A comparison of the U.S. and Nigeria
Abstract: Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an integral component of T4 breast cancer (BCa) treatment. We compared response to NAC for T4 BCa in the U.S. and Nigeria to direct future interventions. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional retrospective analysis included all patients with non-metastatic T4 BCa treated from 2010 to 2016 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, New York) and Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex (Ile Ife, Nigeria). Pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival were compared and factors contributing to disparities evaluated. Results: Three hundred and eight patients met inclusion criteria: 157 (51%) in the U.S. and 151 (49%) in Nigeria. All U.S. patients received NAC and surgery compared with 93 (62%) Nigerian patients. Fifty-six out of ninety-three (60%) Nigerian patients completed their prescribed course of NAC. In Nigeria, older age and higher socioeconomic status were associated with treatment receipt. Fewer patients in Nigeria had immunohistochemistry performed (100% U.S. vs. 18% Nigeria). Of those with available receptor subtype, 18% (28/157) of U.S. patients were triple negative versus 39% (9/23) of Nigerian patients. Overall pCR was seen in 27% (42/155) of U.S. patients and 5% (4/76) of Nigerian patients. Five-year survival was significantly shorter in Nigeria versus the U.S. (61% vs. 72%). However, among the subset of patients who received multimodality therapy, including NAC and surgery with curative intent, 5-year survival (67% vs. 72%) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (48% vs. 61%) did not significantly differ between countries. Conclusion: Addressing health system, socioeconomic, and psychosocial barriers is necessary for administration of complete NAC to improve BCa outcomes in Nigeria. Implications for Practice: This cross-sectional retrospective analysis of patients with T4 breast cancer in Nigeria and the U.S. found a significant difference in pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5% Nigeria vs. 27% U.S.). Five-year survival was shorter in Nigeria, but in patients receiving multimodality treatment, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery with curative intent, 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival did not differ between countries. Capacity-building efforts in Nigeria should focus on access to pathology services to direct systemic therapy and promoting receipt of complete chemotherapy to improve outcomes. © 2021 AlphaMed Press.
Keywords: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; nigeria; locally advanced breast cancer; global oncology; t4 breast cancer
Journal Title: The Oncologist
Volume: 26
Issue: 9
ISSN: 1083-7159
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2021-09-01
Start Page: e1589
End Page: e1598
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/onco.13814
PUBMED: 33955123
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8417844
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 October 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Mary L Gemignani
    218 Gemignani
  2. T Peter Kingham
    609 Kingham
  3. Debra Alyssa Goldman
    158 Goldman