Real-world insights into patients with advanced NSCLC and MET alterations Journal Article


Authors: Bittoni, M.; Yang, J. C. H.; Shih, J. Y.; Peled, N.; Smit, E. F.; Camidge, D. R.; Arasada, R. R.; Oksen, D.; Boutmy, E.; Stroh, C.; Johne, A.; Carbone, D. P.; Paik, P. K.
Article Title: Real-world insights into patients with advanced NSCLC and MET alterations
Abstract: Objectives: To describe characteristics, treatment and outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with MET alterations (MET exon 14 [METex14] skipping or MET amplification [METamp]) in real-world clinical care. Methods: This non-interventional cohort study used real-world data extracted from electronic medical records from academic oncology sites in Israel, The Netherlands, Taiwan, and the USA. Patients had confirmed diagnosis of advanced (Stage IIIB–IV) NSCLC harboring MET alterations (date of diagnosis = index date) between 1 Jan 2010 and 30 Sept 2018. Medical history was assessed prior to and at the index date (baseline period), and outcomes from first date of treatment to death, loss to follow-up, or end of study period. Results: A total of 117 patients were included (METex14 n = 70; METamp n = 47); testing methods were heterogeneous. Concomitant oncogenic mutations were more common in the METamp cohort than METex14. Patients in the METex14 cohort were older than those in METamp, and a larger proportion were never smokers. Anticancer first-line therapies received by patients (METex14; METamp) included chemotherapy only (44%; 41%), MET inhibitors (33%; 29%), immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) mono-(12%; 15%) and combination-therapy (8%; 3%). Second-line therapies included chemotherapy (35%; 30%) and MET inhibitors (30%; 39%). In the METex14 cohort, objective response rate (ORR) was generally low (first-line 28%; second-line 30%); no patients who received ICIs had a response. In the METamp cohort, ORR was 36% in first-line and 22% in second-line. Median (95% confidence interval) overall survival from start of first-line therapy was 12.0 months (6.8, 19.2) in the METex14 cohort and 22.0 months (9.8, 31.2) in METamp. Conclusions: Heterogeneous treatments reflect the changing landscape and availability of new treatments, as well as the high unmet medical need in older, METex14 patients who had more advanced disease at diagnosis. MET-targeted therapies could be beneficial in patients with these rare MET alterations. © 2021 The Author(s)
Keywords: biomarkers; outcomes; advanced nsclc; met amplification; treatment patterns; real-world data; met exon 14
Journal Title: Lung Cancer
Volume: 159
ISSN: 0169-5002
Publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd.  
Date Published: 2021-09-01
Start Page: 96
End Page: 106
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.06.015
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 34320421
PMCID: PMC9345068
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 September 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Paul K Paik
    255 Paik