Use of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Initial results from the pembrolizumab arm of a phase 2 randomized clinical trial Journal Article


Authors: Rahma, O. E.; Yothers, G.; Hong, T. S.; Russell, M. M.; You, Y. N.; Parker, W.; Jacobs, S. A.; Colangelo, L. H.; Lucas, P. C.; Gollub, M. J.; Hall, W. A.; Kachnic, L. A.; Vijayvergia, N.; O'Rourke, M. A.; Faller, B. A.; Valicenti, R. K.; Schefter, T. E.; Moxley, K. M.; Kainthla, R.; Stella, P. J.; Sigurdson, E.; Wolmark, N.; George, T. J.
Article Title: Use of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Initial results from the pembrolizumab arm of a phase 2 randomized clinical trial
Abstract: Importance: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is often used to downstage locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and decrease locoregional relapse; however, more than one-third of patients develop recurrent metastatic disease. As such, novel combinations are needed. Objective: To assess whether the addition of pembrolizumab during and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can lead to an improvement in the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score compared with treatment with FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) and chemoradiotherapy alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this open-label, phase 2, randomized clinical trial (NRG-GI002), patients in academic and private practice settings were enrolled. Patients with stage II/III LARC with distal location (cT3-4 = 5 cm from anal verge, any N), with bulky disease (any cT4 or tumor within 3 mm of mesorectal fascia), at high risk for metastatic disease (cN2), and/or who were not candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery (SSS) were stratified based on clinical tumor and nodal stages. Trial accrual opened on August 1, 2018, and ended on May 31, 2019. This intent-to-treat analysis is based on data as of August 2020. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to neoadjuvant FOLFOX for 4 months and then underwent chemoradiotherapy (capecitabine with 50.4 Gy) with or without intravenous pembrolizumab administered at a dosage of 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 6 doses before surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the NAR score. Secondary end points included pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, SSS, disease-free survival, and overall survival. This report focuses on end points available after definitive surgery (NAR score, pCR, SSS, clinical complete response rate, margin involvement, and safety). Results: A total of 185 patients (126 [68.1%] male; mean [SD] age, 55.7 [11.1] years) were randomized to the control arm (CA) (n = 95) or the pembrolizumab arm (PA) (n = 90). Of these patients, 137 were evaluable for NAR score (68 CA patients and 69 PA patients). The mean (SD) NAR score was 11.53 (12.43) for the PA patients (95% CI, 8.54-14.51) vs 14.08 (13.82) for the CA patients (95% CI, 10.74-17.43) (P =.26). The pCR rate was 31.9% in the PA vs 29.4% in the CA (P =.75). The clinical complete response rate was 13.9% in the PA vs 13.6% in the CA (P =.95). The percentage of patients who underwent SSS was 59.4% in the PA vs 71.0% in the CA (P =.15). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events were slightly increased in the PA (48.2%) vs the CA (37.3%) during chemoradiotherapy. Two deaths occurred during FOLFOX: sepsis (CA) and pneumonia (PA). No differences in radiotherapy fractions, FOLFOX, or capecitabine doses were found. Conclusions and Relevance: Pembrolizumab added to chemoradiotherapy as part of total neoadjuvant therapy was suggested to be safe; however, the NAR score difference does not support further study. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02921256. © 2021 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Journal Title: JAMA Oncology
Volume: 7
Issue: 8
ISSN: 2374-2437
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2021-08-01
Start Page: 1225
End Page: 1230
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1683
PUBMED: 34196693
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8251652
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 September 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Marc J Gollub
    208 Gollub