Diagnosis and evaluation of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: CHEST guideline and expert panel report Guidelines


Authors: Fernández Pérez, E. R.; Travis, W. D.; Lynch, D. A.; Brown, K. K.; Johannson, K. A.; Selman, M.; Ryu, J. H.; Wells, A. U.; Huang, Y. C. T.; Pereira, C. A. C.; Scholand, M. B.; Villar, A.; Inase, N.; Evans, R. B.; Mette, S. A.; Frazer-Green, L.
Title: Diagnosis and evaluation of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: CHEST guideline and expert panel report
Abstract: Background: The purpose of this analysis is to provide evidence-based and consensus-derived guidance for clinicians to improve individual diagnostic decision-making for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and decrease diagnostic practice variability. Study Design and Methods: Approved panelists developed key questions regarding the diagnosis of HP using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) format. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion, and vetted evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract data, and to grade the level of evidence supporting each recommendation or statement. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Graded recommendations and ungraded consensus-based statements were drafted and voted on using a modified Delphi technique to achieve consensus. A diagnostic algorithm is provided, using supporting data from the recommendations where possible, along with expert consensus to help physicians gauge the probability of HP. Results: The systematic review of the literature based on 14 PICO questions resulted in 14 key action statements: 12 evidence-based, graded recommendations and 2 ungraded consensus-based statements. All evidence was of very low quality. Interpretation: Diagnosis of HP should employ a patient-centered approach and include a multidisciplinary assessment that incorporates the environmental and occupational exposure history and CT pattern to establish diagnostic confidence prior to considering BAL and/or lung biopsy. Criteria are presented to facilitate diagnosis of HP. Additional research is needed on the performance characteristics and generalizability of exposure assessment tools and traditional and new diagnostic tests in modifying clinical decision-making for HP, particularly among those with a provisional diagnosis. © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians
Keywords: antibiotic agent; prednisone; anamnesis; placebo; drug megadose; sensitivity and specificity; evidence based medicine; evidence-based medicine; lymphocyte proliferation; differential diagnosis; cyclophosphamide; diagnostic approach route; practice guideline; false negative result; conservative treatment; image quality; antigen recognition; bronchoscopy; clinical decision making; interstitial lung disease; methylprednisolone; immunoassay; azathioprine; corticosteroid; immunosuppressive treatment; guidelines; lung biopsy; lung fibrosis; environmental exposure; immunoglobulin g antibody; predictive value; immunosuppressive agent; receiver operating characteristic; lung nodule; allergic pneumonitis; occupational exposure; high resolution computer tomography; ground glass opacity; forced vital capacity; hypersensitivity pneumonitis; immunoglobulin a antibody; mycophenolate mofetil; prognosis; human; article; multidisciplinary team; diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; antigen avoidance; inhalation test; lung lavage fluid; occupational physician
Journal Title: Chest
Volume: 160
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0012-3692
Publisher: American College of Chest Physicians  
Date Published: 2021-08-01
Start Page: e97
End Page: e156
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.03.066
PUBMED: 33861992
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 September 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. William D Travis
    743 Travis