Efficacy and safety of rucaparib in previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma from a phase 2, open-label trial (ATLAS) Journal Article


Authors: Grivas, P.; Loriot, Y.; Morales-Barrera, R.; Teo, M. Y.; Zakharia, Y.; Feyerabend, S.; Vogelzang, N. J.; Grande, E.; Adra, N.; Alva, A.; Necchi, A.; Rodriguez-Vida, A.; Gupta, S.; Josephs, D. H.; Srinivas, S.; Wride, K.; Thomas, D.; Simmons, A.; Loehr, A.; Dusek, R. L.; Nepert, D.; Chowdhury, S.
Article Title: Efficacy and safety of rucaparib in previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma from a phase 2, open-label trial (ATLAS)
Abstract: Background: ATLAS evaluated the efficacy and safety of the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with previously treated locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Methods: Patients with UC were enrolled independent of tumor homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status and received rucaparib 600 mg BID. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (RECIST v1.1) in the intent-to-treat and HRD-positive (loss of genome-wide heterozygosity ≥10%) populations. Key secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Disease control rate (DCR) was defined post-hoc as the proportion of patients with a confirmed complete or partial response (PR), or stable disease lasting ≥16 weeks. Results: Of 97 enrolled patients, 20 (20.6%) were HRD-positive, 30 (30.9%) HRD-negative, and 47 (48.5%) HRD-indeterminate. Among 95 evaluable patients, there were no confirmed responses. However, reductions in the sum of target lesions were observed, including 6 (6.3%) patients with unconfirmed PR. DCR was 11.6%; median PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.6–1.9). No relationship was observed between HRD status and efficacy endpoints. Median treatment duration was 1.8 months (range, 0.1–10.1). Most frequent any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events were asthenia/fatigue (57.7%), nausea (42.3%), and anemia (36.1%). Of 64 patients with data from tumor tissue samples, 10 (15.6%) had a deleterious alteration in a DNA damage repair pathway gene, including four with a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration. Conclusions: Rucaparib did not show significant activity in unselected patients with advanced UC regardless of HRD status. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in patients with ovarian or prostate cancer. Trial registration: This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03397394). Date of registration: 12 January 2018. This trial was registered in EudraCT (2017–004166-10). © 2021, The Author(s).
Keywords: bladder cancer; urothelial carcinoma; parp inhibitor; rucaparib; genomic biomarkers
Journal Title: BMC Cancer
Volume: 21
ISSN: 1471-2407
Publisher: Biomed Central Ltd  
Date Published: 2021-05-24
Start Page: 593
Language: English
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08085-z
PUBMED: 34030643
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8147008
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 July 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
MSK Authors
  1. Min Yuen   Teo
    88 Teo