Prophylaxis with intrathecal or high-dose methotrexate in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and high risk of CNS relapse Journal Article


Authors: Bobillo, S.; Joffe, E.; Sermer, D.; Mondello, P.; Ghione, P.; Caron, P. C.; Hamilton, A.; Hamlin, P. A.; Horwitz, S. M.; Kumar, A.; Matasar, M. J.; Batlevi, C. L.; Moskowitz, A.; Noy, A.; Owens, C. N.; Palomba, M. L.; Straus, D.; von Keudell, G.; Dogan, A.; Zelenetz, A. D.; Seshan, V. E.; Younes, A.
Article Title: Prophylaxis with intrathecal or high-dose methotrexate in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and high risk of CNS relapse
Abstract: Although methotrexate (MTX) is the most widely used therapy for central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the optimal regimen remains unclear. We examined the efficacy of different prophylactic regimens in 585 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and high-risk for CNS relapse, treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) or R-CHOP-like regimens from 2001 to 2017, of whom 295 (50%) received prophylaxis. Intrathecal (IT) MTX was given to 253 (86%) and high-dose MTX (HD-MTX) to 42 (14%). After a median follow-up of 6.8 years, 36 of 585 patients relapsed in the CNS, of whom 14 had received prophylaxis. The CNS relapse risk at 1 year was lower for patients who received prophylaxis than patients who did not: 2% vs. 7.1%. However, the difference became less significant over time (5-year risk 5.6% vs. 7.5%), indicating prophylaxis tended to delay CNS relapse rather than prevent it. Furthermore, the CNS relapse risk was similar in patients who received IT and HD-MTX (5-year risk 5.6% vs. 5.2%). Collectively, our data indicate the benefit of MTX for CNS prophylaxis is transient, highlighting the need for more effective prophylactic regimens. In addition, our results failed to demonstrate a clinical advantage for the HD-MTX regimen. © 2021, The Author(s).
Journal Title: Blood Cancer Journal
Volume: 11
Issue: 6
ISSN: 2044-5385
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group  
Date Published: 2021-06-16
Start Page: 113
Language: English
DOI: 10.1038/s41408-021-00506-3
PUBMED: 34135307
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8209097
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 July 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Venkatraman Ennapadam Seshan
    385 Seshan
  2. Ariela Noy
    369 Noy
  3. Maria Lia Palomba
    441 Palomba
  4. Steven M Horwitz
    664 Horwitz
  5. Andrew D Zelenetz
    781 Zelenetz
  6. Alison Moskowitz
    355 Moskowitz
  7. Paul Hamlin
    291 Hamlin
  8. Matthew J Matasar
    292 Matasar
  9. Philip C Caron
    100 Caron
  10. David J Straus
    360 Straus
  11. Anita Kumar
    195 Kumar
  12. Connie Wing-Ching Lee Batlevi
    177 Batlevi
  13. Anas Younes
    320 Younes
  14. Ahmet Dogan
    469 Dogan
  15. Colette Ngozi Owens
    78 Owens
  16. Erel Joffe
    84 Joffe
  17. Paola Ghione
    87 Ghione
  18. David Sermer
    12 Sermer