Phase III, randomized trial of mirvetuximab soravtansine versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: Primary analysis of FORWARD I Journal Article


Authors: Moore, K. N.; Oza, A. M.; Colombo, N.; Oaknin, A.; Scambia, G.; Lorusso, D.; Konecny, G. E.; Banerjee, S.; Murphy, C. G.; Tanyi, J. L.; Hirte, H.; Konner, J. A.; Lim, P. C.; Prasad-Hayes, M.; Monk, B. J.; Pautier, P.; Wang, J.; Berkenblit, A.; Vergote, I.; Birrer, M. J.
Article Title: Phase III, randomized trial of mirvetuximab soravtansine versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: Primary analysis of FORWARD I
Abstract: Background: Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding antibody, cleavable linker, and the maytansinoid DM4, a potent tubulin-targeting agent. The randomized, open-label, phase III study FORWARD I compared MIRV and investigator's choice chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and methods: Eligible patients with 1-3 prior lines of therapy and whose tumors were positive for FRα expression were randomly assigned, in a 2 : 1 ratio, to receive MIRV (6 mg/kg, adjusted ideal body weight) or chemotherapy (paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival [PFS, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, blinded independent central review] in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and in the prespecified FRα high population. Results: A total of 366 patients were randomized; 243 received MIRV and 109 received chemotherapy. The primary endpoint, PFS, did not reach statistical significance in either the ITT [hazard ratio (HR), 0.98, P = 0.897] or the FRα high population (HR, 0.69, P = 0.049). Superior outcomes for MIRV over chemotherapy were observed in all secondary endpoints in the FRα high population including improved objective response rate (24% versus 10%), CA-125 responses (53% versus 25%), and patient-reported outcomes (27% versus 13%). Fewer treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (25.1% versus 44.0%), and fewer events leading to dose reduction (19.8% versus 30.3%) and treatment discontinuation (4.5% versus 8.3%) were seen with MIRV compared with chemotherapy. Conclusions: In patients with platinum-resistant EOC, MIRV did not result in a significant improvement in PFS compared with chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints consistently favored MIRV, particularly in patients with high FRα expression. MIRV showed a differentiated and more manageable safety profile than chemotherapy. © 2021 The Author(s)
Keywords: chemotherapy; ovarian cancer; folate receptor alpha; antibody-drug conjugate; mirvetuximab soravtansine
Journal Title: Annals of Oncology
Volume: 32
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0923-7534
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2021-06-01
Start Page: 757
End Page: 765
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.017
PUBMED: 33667670
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 June 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jason Konner
    155 Konner