A phase II trial of olanzapine, dexamethasone, and palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A Hoosier oncology group study Journal Article


Authors: Navari, R. M.; Einhorn, L. H.; Loehrer, P. J. Sr; Passik, S. D.; Vinson, J.; McClean, J.; Chowhan, N.; Hanna, N. H.; Johnson, C. S.
Article Title: A phase II trial of olanzapine, dexamethasone, and palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A Hoosier oncology group study
Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine the control of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) and highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) with the combined use of palonosetron and olanzapine, and dexamethasone with the dexamethasone given on day 1 only. Materials and methods: Forty chemotherapy-naive patients received on the day of chemotherapy, day 1, an anti-emetic regimen consisting of dexamethasone, palonosetron, and olanzapine. Patients continued olanzapine for days 2-4 after chemotherapy administration. Patients recorded daily episodes of emesis, daily symptoms utilizing the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory, and the utilization of rescue therapy. Results: For the first cycle of chemotherapy, the complete response (no emesis, no rescue) for the acute period (24 h post-chemotherapy) was 100%, the delayed period (days 2-5 post-chemotherapy) 75%, and the overall period (0 120 h post-chemotherapy) 75% in 8 patients receiving HEC and was 97, 75, and 72% in 32 patients receiving MEC. Patients with no nausea for the acute period was 100%, the delayed period 50%, and the overall period 50% in 8 patients receiving HEC and was 100, 78, and 78% in 32 patients receiving MEC. Discussion: The complete response and control of nausea in subsequent cycles of chemotherapy were not significantly different from cycle one. Conclusion: Olanzapine combined with a single dose of dexamethasone and a single dose of palonosetron was very effective in controlling acute and delayed CINV in patients receiving both HEC and MEC. © 2007 Springer-Verlag.
Keywords: adult; cancer chemotherapy; clinical article; treatment response; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; clinical trial; cisplatin; doxorubicin; drug efficacy; antineoplastic agents; united states; chemotherapy; neoplasms; carboplatin; chemoprophylaxis; multiple cycle treatment; phase 2 clinical trial; breast cancer; nausea; vomiting; olanzapine; lung cancer; cyclophosphamide; dexamethasone; bladder cancer; outcome assessment (health care); irinotecan; chemotherapy induced emesis; colon cancer; scoring system; single drug dose; rating scale; antiemetics; isoquinolines; palonosetron; benzodiazepines; anti-emetic therapy; delayed emesis; lymphangiosarcoma; quinuclidines
Journal Title: Supportive Care in Cancer
Volume: 15
Issue: 11
ISSN: 0941-4355
Publisher: Springer Verlag  
Date Published: 2007-11-01
Start Page: 1285
End Page: 1291
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-007-0248-5
PUBMED: 17375339
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 37" - "Export Date: 17 November 2011" - "CODEN: SCCAE" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Steven D Passik
    122 Passik