Who enrolls onto clinical oncology trials? A radiation patterns of care study analysis Journal Article


Authors: Movsas, B.; Moughan, J.; Owen, J.; Coia, L. R.; Zelefsky, M. J.; Hanks, G.; Wilson, J. F.
Article Title: Who enrolls onto clinical oncology trials? A radiation patterns of care study analysis
Abstract: Purpose: To identify factors significantly influencing accrual to clinical protocols by analyzing radiation Patterns of Care Study (PCS) surveys of 3,047 randomly selected radiotherapy (RT) patients. Methods and Materials: Patterns of Care Study surveys from disease sites studied for the periods 1992-1994 and 1996-1999 (breast cancer, n = 1,080; prostate cancer, n = 1,149; esophageal cancer, n = 818) were analyzed. The PCS is a National Cancer Institute-funded national survey of randomly selected RT institutions in the United States. Patients with nonmetastatic disease who received RT as definitive or adjuvant therapy were randomly selected from eligible patients at each institution. To determine national estimates, individual patient records were weighted by the relative contribution of each institution and patients within each institution. Data regarding participation in clinical trials were recorded. The factors age, gender, race, type of insurance, and practice type of treating institution (academic or not) were studied by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Overall, only 2.7% of all patients were accrued to clinical protocols. Of these, 57% were enrolled on institutional review board-approved institutional trials, and 43% on National Cancer Institute collaborative group studies. On multivariate analysis, patients treated at academic facilities (p = 0.0001) and white patients (vs. African Americans, p = 0.0002) were significantly more likely to participate in clinical oncology trials. Age, gender, type of cancer, and type of insurance were not predictive. Conclusions: Practice type and race significantly influence enrollment onto clinical oncology trials. This suggests that increased communication and education regarding protocols, particularly focusing on physicians in nonacademic settings and minority patients, will be essential to enhance accrual. © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; aged; middle aged; patient selection; united states; cancer patient; neoplasms; breast cancer; radiation; radiotherapy; clinical protocol; patient monitoring; breast neoplasms; oncology; prostate cancer; prostatic neoplasms; health care; health insurance; professional practice; statistical significance; physicians; education; tumors; radiation oncology; medical record; medical practice; physician; interpersonal communication; multivariate analysis; sex factors; gender; esophagus cancer; university hospital; univariate analysis; analysis of variance; european continental ancestry group; african american; clinical trials; esophageal neoplasms; esophageal cancer; race; african continental ancestry group; insurance, health; institutional care; academies and institutes; barriers to participation; clinical oncology trials; data reduction
Journal Title: International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Volume: 68
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0360-3016
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2007-07-15
Start Page: 1145
End Page: 1150
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.051
PUBMED: 17418963
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: --- - "Cited By (since 1996): 3" - "Export Date: 17 November 2011" - "CODEN: IOBPD" - "Source: Scopus"
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Michael J Zelefsky
    754 Zelefsky