Defining phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells by mass cytometry Journal Article


Authors: Galdieri, L.; Jash, A.; Malkova, O.; Mao, D. D.; DeSouza, P.; Chu, Y. E.; Salter, A.; Campian, J. L.; Naegle, K. M.; Brennan, C. W.; Wakimoto, H.; Oh, S. T.; Kim, A. H.; Chheda, M. G.
Article Title: Defining phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of glioblastoma stem cells by mass cytometry
Abstract: Most patients with glioblastoma (GBM) die within 2 years. A major therapeutic goal is to target GBM stem cells (GSCs), a subpopulation of cells that contribute to treatment resistance and recurrence. Since their discovery in 2003, GSCs have been isolated using single-surface markers, such as CD15, CD44, CD133, and α6 integrin. It remains unknown how these single-surface marker-defined GSC populations compare with each other in terms of signaling and function and whether expression of different combinations of these markers is associated with different functional capacity. Using mass cytometry and fresh operating room specimens, we found 15 distinct GSC subpopulations in patients, and they differed in their MEK/ERK, WNT, and AKT pathway activation status. Once in culture, some subpopulations were lost and previously undetectable ones materialized. GSCs that highly expressed all 4 surface markers had the greatest self-renewal capacity, WNT inhibitor sensitivity, and in vivo tumorigenicity. This work highlights the potential signaling and phenotypic diversity of GSCs. Larger patient sample sizes and antibody panels are required to confirm these findings. © 2021, Galdieri et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal Title: JCI Insight
Volume: 6
Issue: 4
ISSN: 2379-3708
Publisher: Amer Soc Clinical Investigation Inc  
Date Published: 2021-02-22
Start Page: e128456
Language: English
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.128456
PUBMED: 33400685
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC7934942
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 April 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Cameron Brennan
    226 Brennan