Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) for local staging of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Review
| Authors: | Woo, S.; Ghafoor, S.; Becker, A. S.; Han, S.; Wibmer, A. G.; Hricak, H.; Burger, I. A.; Schöder, H.; Vargas, H. A. |
| Review Title: | Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) for local staging of prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Abstract: | Purpose: Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has shown promise for detecting nodal and distant prostate cancer (PCa) metastases. However, its performance for local tumor staging is not as well established. The purpose of this study was to review the diagnostic performance of PSMA-PET for determining seminal vesical invasion (SVI) and extraprostatic extension (EPE). Methods: Pubmed and Embase databases were searched until January 12, 2020. Studies assessing accuracy of PSMA-PET in determining SVI and EPE were included. Study quality was evaluated with the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics modeling. Heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression analyses for anatomical imaging component (MRI vs CT) and by testing for a threshold effect. Results: Twelve studies (615 patients) were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.68 (95% CI 0.53-0.81) and 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.96) for SVI and 0.72 (95% CI 0.56-0.84) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.72-0.94) for EPE. Meta-regression analyses showed that for SVI, PET/MRI demonstrated greater sensitivity than PET/CT (0.87 [95% CI 0.75-0.98] vs 0.60 [95% CI 0.47-0.74]; p = 0.02 for joint model) while specificity was comparable (0.91 [95% CI 0.84-0.97] vs. 0.96 [95% CI 0.93-0.99]) but not for EPE (p = 0.08). A threshold effect was present for studies assessing EPE (correlation coefficient = 0.563 [95% CI, −0.234-0.908] between sensitivity and false-positive rate). Conclusion: PSMA-PET has moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity for assessing local tumor extent in patients with PCa. PET/MRI showed potential for greater sensitivity than PET/CT in assessing SVI. © 2020, The Author(s). |
| Keywords: | positron emission tomography; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate cancer; computed tomography; meta-analysis; prostate-specific membrane antigen |
| Journal Title: | European Journal of Hybrid Imaging |
| Volume: | 4 |
| ISSN: | 2510-3636 |
| Publisher: | SpringerOpen |
| Date Published: | 2020-09-09 |
| Start Page: | 16 |
| Language: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1186/s41824-020-00085-9 |
| PROVIDER: | scopus |
| PMCID: | PMC8218057 |
| PUBMED: | 34191215 |
| DOI/URL: | |
| Notes: | Article -- Export Date: 1 March 2021 -- Source: Scopus |
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
Related MSK Work