Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: ASCO guideline Guidelines


Authors: Gordan, J. D.; Kennedy, E. B.; Abou-Alfa, G. K.; Beg, M. S.; Brower, S. T.; Gade, T. P.; Goff, L.; Gupta, S.; Guy, J.; Harris, W. P.; Iyer, R.; Jaiyesimi, I.; Jhawer, M.; Karippot, A.; Kaseb, A. O.; Kelley, R. K.; Knox, J. J.; Kortmansky, J.; Leaf, A.; Remak, W. M.; Shroff, R. T.; Sohal, D. P. S.; Taddei, T. H.; Venepalli, N. K.; Wilson, A.; Zhu, A. X.; Rose, M. G.
Title: Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: ASCO guideline
Abstract: PURPOSETo develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline to assist in clinical decision making for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).METHODSASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of published phase III randomized controlled trials (2007-2020) on systemic therapy for advanced HCC and provide recommended care options for this patient population.RESULTSNine phase III randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria.RECOMMENDATIONSAtezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezo + bev) may be offered as first-line treatment of most patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0-1, and following management of esophageal varices, when present, according to institutional guidelines. Where there are contraindications to atezolizumab and/or bevacizumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib or lenvatinib may be offered as first-line treatment of patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, and ECOG PS 0-1. Following first-line treatment with atezo + bev, and until better data are available, second-line therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor may be recommended for appropriate candidates. Following first-line therapy with sorafenib or lenvatinib, second-line therapy options for appropriate candidates include cabozantinib, regorafenib for patients who previously tolerated sorafenib, or ramucirumab (for patients with alpha -fetoprotein >= 400 ng/mL), or atezo + bev where patients did not have access to this option as first-line therapy. Pembrolizumab or nivolumab are also reasonable options for appropriate patients following sorafenib or lenvatinib. Consideration of nivolumab + ipilimumab as an option for second-line therapy and third-line therapy is discussed. Further guidance on choosing between therapy options is included within the guideline. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.
Keywords: survival; sorafenib; cost-effectiveness; double-blind; racial disparities; oral chemotherapy; clinical-practice; 2nd-line treatment; american society; cancer
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 38
Issue: 36
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2020-12-01
Start Page: 4317
End Page: 4345
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:000601175100002
DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02672
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 32795228
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Ghassan Abou-Alfa
    571 Abou-Alfa