Final analysis of the ipilimumab versus placebo following radiotherapy phase III trial in postdocetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer identifies an excess of long-term survivors Journal Article


Authors: Fizazi, K.; Drake, C. G.; Beer, T. M.; Kwon, E. D.; Scher, H. I.; Gerritsen, W. R.; Bossi, A.; van den Eertwegh, A. J. M.; Krainer, M.; Houede, N.; Santos, R.; Mahammedi, H.; Ng, S.; Danielli, R.; Franke, F. A.; Sundar, S.; Agarwal, N.; Bergman, A. M.; Ciuleanu, T. E.; Korbenfeld, E.; Sengeløv, L.; Hansen, S.; McHenry, M. B.; Chen, A.; Logothetis, C.; for the CA184-043 Investigators
Article Title: Final analysis of the ipilimumab versus placebo following radiotherapy phase III trial in postdocetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer identifies an excess of long-term survivors
Abstract: Background: The phase 3 trial CA184-043 evaluated radiotherapy to bone metastases followed by Ipilimumab or placebo in men with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had received docetaxel previously. In a prior analysis, the trial's primary endpoint (overall survival [OS]) was not improved significantly. Objective: To report the final analysis of OS. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 799 patients were randomized to receive a single dose of radiotherapy to one or more bone metastases followed by either Ipilimumab (n = 399) or placebo (n = 400). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: OS was analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Prespecified and exploratory subset analyses based on Kaplan-Meier/Cox methodology were performed. Results and limitations: During an additional follow-up of approximately 2.4 yr since the primary analysis, 721/799 patients have died. Survival analysis showed crossing of the curves at 7–8 mo, followed by persistent separation of the curves beyond that point, favoring the ipilimumab arm. Given the lack of proportional hazards, a piecewise hazard model showed that the hazard ratio (HR) changed over time: the HR was 1.49 (95% confidence interval 1.12, 1.99) for 0–5 mo, 0.66 (0.51, 0.86) for 5–12 mo, and 0.66 (0.52, 0.84) beyond 12 mo. OS rates were higher in the ipilimumab versus placebo arms at 2 yr (25.2% vs 16.6%), 3 yr (15.3% vs 7.9%), 4 yr (10.1% vs 3.3%), and 5 yr (7.9% vs. 2.7%). Disease progression was the most frequent cause of death in both arms. In seven patients (1.8%) in the ipilimumab arm and one (0.3%) in the placebo arm, the primary cause of death was reported as study drug toxicity. No long-term safety signals were identified. Conclusions: In this preplanned long-term analysis, OS favored ipilimumab plus radiotherapy versus placebo plus radiotherapy for patients with postdocetaxel mCRPC. OS rates at 3, 4, and 5 yr were approximately two to three times higher in the ipilimumab arm. Patient summary: After longer follow-up, survival favored the group of men who received ipilimumab, with overall survival rates being two to three times higher at 3 yr and beyond. © 2020 European Association of Urology In this preplanned long-term analysis, overall survival favored ipilimumab plus radiotherapy versus placebo plus radiotherapy for patients with postdocetaxel metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Beyond approximately 2 yr of follow-up, long-term survivors were two to three times more prevalent in the ipilimumab arm. © 2020 European Association of Urology
Keywords: ipilimumab; radiotherapy; prostate cancer; immunotherapy
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 78
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2020-12-01
Start Page: 822
End Page: 830
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.032
PUBMED: 32811715
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC8428575
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 4 January 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Howard Scher
    1129 Scher