A phase 3 randomized study of 5-azacitidine maintenance vs observation after transplant in high-risk AML and MDS patients Journal Article


Authors: Oran, B.; de Lima, M.; Garcia-Manero, G.; Thall, P. F.; Lin, R.; Popat, U.; Alousi, A. M.; Hosing, C.; Giralt, S.; Rondon, G.; Woodworth, G.; Champlin, R. E.
Article Title: A phase 3 randomized study of 5-azacitidine maintenance vs observation after transplant in high-risk AML and MDS patients
Abstract: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of azacitidine maintenance in the posttransplant setting based on the encouraging phase 1/2 reports for azacitidine maintenance in patients with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/ MDS). Between 2009 and 2017, a total of 187 patients aged 18 to 75 years were entered into a randomized controlled study of posttransplant azacitidine if they were in complete remission. Patients randomized to the treatment arm (n 5 93) were scheduled to receive azacitidine, given as 32 mg/m2 per day subcutaneously for 5 days every 28 days for 12 cycles. The control arm (n 5 94) had no intervention. Eighty-seven of the 93 patients started azacitidine maintenance. The median number of cycles received was 4; a total of 29 patients relapsed on study, and 23 patients withdrew from the study due to toxicity, patient’s preference, or logistical reasons. Median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 2.07 years in the azacitidine group vs 1.28 years in the control group (P 5 .19). There was also no significant difference for overall survival, with a median of 2.52 years vs 3.56 years in the azacitidine and control groups (P 5 .43), respectively. Cox regression analysis revealed no improvement in RFS or overall survival with the use of azacitidine as maintenance compared with the control group (hazard ratios of 0.86 [95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.3; P 5 .43] and 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.29; P 5 .43]). This randomized trial with azacitidine maintenance showed that a prospective trial in the posttransplant setting was feasible and safe but challenging. Although RFS was comparable between the 2 arms, we believe the strategy of maintenance therapy merits further study with a goal to reduce the risk of relapse in patients with AML/MDS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00887068. © 2020 by The American Society of Hematology
Keywords: adult; controlled study; treatment outcome; treatment response; aged; survival rate; human cell; major clinical study; overall survival; cancer recurrence; drug efficacy; drug safety; drug withdrawal; risk benefit analysis; side effect; follow up; infection; multiple cycle treatment; lung disease; randomized controlled trial; thrombocytopenia; incidence; cytogenetics; high risk patient; survival time; myelodysplastic syndrome; feasibility study; bone marrow biopsy; comorbidity; graft versus host reaction; allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; liver disease; skin disease; phase 3 clinical trial; risk reduction; gastrointestinal disease; azacitidine; recurrence free survival; acute myeloid leukemia; mortality rate; maintenance chemotherapy; human; male; female; priority journal; article
Journal Title: Blood Advances
Volume: 4
Issue: 21
ISSN: 2473-9529
Publisher: American Society of Hematology  
Date Published: 2020-11-10
Start Page: 5580
End Page: 5588
Language: English
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002544
PUBMED: 33170934
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC7656915
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 4 January 2021 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sergio Andres Giralt
    1050 Giralt