Gender disparity in industry relationships with academic interventional radiology physicians Journal Article


Authors: Deipolyi, A. R.; Becker, A. S.; Covey, A. M.; Chimonas, S. C.; Rosenkrantz, A. B.; Forman, H. P.; Copen, W. A.
Article Title: Gender disparity in industry relationships with academic interventional radiology physicians
Abstract: OBJECTIVE. Industry relationships drive technologic innovation in interventional radiology and offer opportunities for professional growth. Women are underrepresented in interventional radiology despite the growing recognition of the importance of diversity. This study characterized gender disparities in financial relationships between industry and academic interventional radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, U.S. academic interventional radiology physicians and their academic ranks were identified by searching websites of practices with accredited interventional radiology fellowship programs. Publicly available databases were queried to collect each physician's gender, years since medical school graduation, h-index, academic rank, and industry payments in 2018. Wilcoxon and chi-square tests compared payments between genders. A general linear model assessed the impact of academic rank, years since graduation, gender, and h-index on payments. RESULTS. Of 842 academic interventional radiology physicians, 108 (13%) were women. A total $14,206,599.41 was received by 686 doctors (81%); only $147,975.28 (1%) was received by women. A lower percentage of women (74%) than men (83%) received payments (p = 0.04); median total payments were lower for women ($535) than men ($792) (p = 0.01). Academic rank, h-index, years since graduation, and male gender were independent predictors of higher payments. Industry payments supporting technologic advancement were made exclusively to men. CONCLUSION. Female interventional radiology physicians received fewer and lower industry payments, earning 1% of total payments despite constituting 13% of physicians. Gender independently predicted industry payments, regardless of h-index, academic rank, or years since graduation. Gender disparity in interventional radiology physician-industry relationships warrants further investigation and correction.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; retrospective study; interventional radiology; cross-sectional study; gender; human experiment; conflict of interest; medical school; human; male; female; article; interventional radiologist; industry payments; sunshine act
Journal Title: American Journal of Roentgenology
Volume: 215
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0361-803X
Publisher: American Roentgen Ray Society  
Date Published: 2020-08-01
Start Page: 494
End Page: 501
Language: English
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.22176
PUBMED: 32348184
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC9040023
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 September 2020 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Anne Covey
    166 Covey
  2. Anton Sebastian Becker
    40 Becker