Mammography after prosthesis placement for augmentation or reconstructive mammoplasty Journal Article


Authors: Dershaw, D. D.; Chaglassian, T. A.
Article Title: Mammography after prosthesis placement for augmentation or reconstructive mammoplasty
Abstract: Mammograms of 59 women who underwent placement of a prosthesis for augmentation or reconstructive mammoplasty were retrospectively reviewed. Free silicone was used in five women, retroglandular prostheses in 40, and subpectoral implants in 14. Abnormalities of prosthesis contour were seen only in eight women with retroglandular implants. In another four women, retroglandular prostheses became calcified. In women who received free-silicone injections, coarse calcifications developed in three, and gross nodularity with calcified silicone granulomas developed in one. Five palpable masses developed, three of which were malignant; four masses were in breasts augmented with a retroglandular prosthesis, and they could not be detected with mammography. The mass that developed in a woman with a subpectoral prosthesis could be seen at mammography. The only nonpalpable malignancy detected with mammography was in a breast with a retrograndular prosthesis and contained microcalcifications. The authors conclude that in women with retrograndular prostheses, masses may often be obscured on mammograms by compressed, dense glandular tissue.
Keywords: adult; aged; major clinical study; breast reconstruction; mammography; breast endoprosthesis; breast augmentation; human; female; priority journal
Journal Title: Radiology
Volume: 170
Issue: 1
ISSN: 0033-8419
Publisher: Radiological Society of North America, Inc.  
Date Published: 1989-01-01
Start Page: 69
End Page: 74
Language: English
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.170.1.2909122
PUBMED: 2909122
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 14 April 2020 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. D David Dershaw
    223 Dershaw