Objective response rate among patients with locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma treated with talimogene laherparepvec in combination with pembrolizumab: A phase 2 clinical trial Journal Article


Authors: Kelly, C. M.; Antonescu, C. R.; Bowler, T.; Munhoz, R.; Chi, P.; Dickson, M. A.; Gounder, M. M.; Keohan, M. L.; Movva, S.; Dholakia, R.; Ahmad, H.; Biniakewitz, M.; Condy, M.; Phelan, H.; Callahan, M.; Wong, P.; Singer, S.; Ariyan, C.; Bartlett, E. K.; Crago, A.; Yoon, S.; Hwang, S.; Erinjeri, J. P.; Qin, L. X.; Tap, W. D.; D'Angelo, S. P.
Article Title: Objective response rate among patients with locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma treated with talimogene laherparepvec in combination with pembrolizumab: A phase 2 clinical trial
Abstract: Importance: Patients with advanced sarcoma have limited treatment options. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has been shown to increase tumor-specific immune activation via augmenting antigen presentation and T-cell priming. Objective: To examine whether T-VEC in combination with pembrolizumab is associated with increased tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte infiltration and programmed death-ligand 1 expression and thus with increased antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label, single-institution phase 2 interventional trial of T-VEC plus pembrolizumab enrolled 20 patients with locally advanced or metastatic sarcoma between March 16 and December 4, 2017, for whom at least 1 standard systemic therapy had failed. The median duration of therapy was 16 weeks (range, 7-67 weeks). Reported analyses include data through December 14, 2018. Intervention: Patients received pembrolizumab (200-mg flat dose) intravenously and T-VEC (first dose, ≤4 mL × 106 plaque-forming units [PFU]/mL; second and subsequent doses, ≤4 mL × 108 PFU/mL) injected into palpable tumor site(s) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR; complete response and partial response) at 24 weeks determined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, criteria. Secondary end points included best ORR by immune-related RECIST criteria, progression-free survival rate at 24 weeks, overall survival, and safety. Results: All 20 patients (12 women [60%]; median age, 63.5 years [range, 24-90 years]) were evaluable for response. The study met its primary end point of evaluating the best ORR at 24 weeks determined by RECIST, version 1.1, criteria; the best ORR was 30% (95% CI, 12%-54%; n = 6). The ORR overall was 35% (95% CI, 15%-59%; n = 7). The incidence of grade 3 treatment-related adverse events was low (4 patients [20%]). There were no grade 4 treatment-related adverse events or treatment-related deaths. Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 2 clinical trial, treatment with T-VEC plus pembrolizumab was associated with antitumor activity in advanced sarcoma across a range of sarcoma histologic subtypes, with a manageable safety profile. This combination therapy met its predefined primary study end point; further evaluation of T-VEC in combination with pembrolizumab for patients with select sarcoma subtypes is planned. © 2019 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; clinical article; controlled study; protein expression; aged; overall survival; fatigue; advanced cancer; drug safety; drug withdrawal; side effect; treatment duration; outcome assessment; tumor associated leukocyte; progression free survival; phase 2 clinical trial; anemia; thrombocytopenia; cohort analysis; antineoplastic activity; chill; coughing; fever; pneumonia; pruritus; sarcoma; aspartate aminotransferase; drug response; scoring system; nausea and vomiting; open study; hypothyroidism; lymphocytic infiltration; drug substitution; amylase; uveitis; programmed death 1 ligand 1; optic neuritis; talimogene laherparepvec; human; male; female; article; pembrolizumab
Journal Title: JAMA Oncology
Volume: 6
Issue: 3
ISSN: 2374-2437
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2020-03-01
Start Page: 402
End Page: 408
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6152
PUBMED: 31971541
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC6990941
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sam Yoon
    108 Yoon
  2. Cristina R Antonescu
    895 Antonescu
  3. Phillip Wong
    78 Wong
  4. Ping Chi
    172 Chi
  5. Sinchun Hwang
    96 Hwang
  6. Li-Xuan Qin
    190 Qin
  7. Mary Louise Keohan
    124 Keohan
  8. Mrinal M Gounder
    228 Gounder
  9. Sandra Pierina D'Angelo
    252 D'Angelo
  10. Margaret Kathleen Callahan
    197 Callahan
  11. Aimee Marie Crago
    106 Crago
  12. Samuel Singer
    337 Singer
  13. Charlotte Eielson Ariyan
    154 Ariyan
  14. Joseph Patrick Erinjeri
    200 Erinjeri
  15. Mark Andrew Dickson
    169 Dickson
  16. Mercedes M Condy
    19 Condy
  17. William Douglas Tap
    372 Tap
  18. Rodrigo Ramella Munhoz
    19 Munhoz
  19. Ciara Marie Kelly
    89 Kelly
  20. Timothy Geoffrey Bowler
    9 Bowler
  21. Sujana Movva
    46 Movva
  22. Haley Turner Phelan
    7 Phelan
  23. Hamza Ahmad
    6 Ahmad