Quality measurement in cancer care: A review and endorsement of high-impact measures and concepts Review


Authors: D’Amico, T. A.; Bandini, L. A. M.; Balch, A.; Benson, A. B. 3rd; Edge, S. B.; Lyn Fitzgerald, C.; Green, R. J.; Koh, W. J.; Kolodziej, M.; Kumar, S.; Meropol, N. J.; Mohler, J. L.; Pfister, D.; Walters, R. S.; Carlson, R. W.
Review Title: Quality measurement in cancer care: A review and endorsement of high-impact measures and concepts
Abstract: Although oncology care has evolved, outcome assessment remains a key challenge. Outcome measurement requires identification and adoption of a succinct list of metrics indicative of high-quality cancer care for use within and across healthcare systems. NCCN established an advisory committee, the NCCN Quality and Outcomes Committee, consisting of provider experts from NCCN Member Institutions and other stakeholders, including payers and patient advocacy, community oncology, and health information technology representatives, to review the existing quality landscape and identify contemporary, relevant cancer quality and outcomes measures by reevaluating validated measures for endorsement and proposing new measure concepts to fill crucial gaps. This manuscript reports on 22 measures and concepts; 15 that align with existing measures and 7 that are new. © JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Journal Title: Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Volume: 18
Issue: 3
ISSN: 1540-1405
Publisher: Harborside Press  
Date Published: 2020-03-01
Start Page: 250
End Page: 259
Language: English
DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7536
PUBMED: 32135508
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 April 2020 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. David G Pfister
    389 Pfister