Hypofractionated vs. conventional radiation therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated without chemotherapy Journal Article


Authors: Iocolano, M.; Wild, A. T.; Hannum, M.; Zhang, Z.; Simone, C. B. 2nd; Gelblum, D.; Wu, A. J.; Rimner, A.; Shepherd, A. F.
Article Title: Hypofractionated vs. conventional radiation therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated without chemotherapy
Abstract: Background: Patients with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC who refuse or are not candidates for chemotherapy often receive radiation therapy (RT) alone. Hypofractionated RT (HFRT) regimens are becoming increasingly common. An analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was performed to evaluate the practice patterns and outcomes of HFRT vs. conventionally fractionated RT (CFRT) in patients with stage III NSCLC undergoing definitive RT alone. Material and methods: The NCDB was queried for all patients with stage III NSCLC diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 who received RT alone. CFRT was defined as patients treated to a total dose of 60–80 Gy in 1.8–2 Gy daily fractions. HFRT was defined as patients treated to a total dose of 50–80 Gy in 2.25–4 Gy fractions. Logistic regression, univariable and multivariable analyses (MVAs) for overall survival (OS) and propensity score matched analyses (PSMAs) were performed. Results: A total of 6490 patients were evaluated: 5378 received CFRT and 1112 received HFRT. Median CFRT dose was 66 Gy in 2 Gy fractions vs. 58.5 Gy in 2.5 Gy fractions for HFRT. HFRT was associated with older age, lower biological effective dose (BED10), academic facility type, higher T-stage and lower N-stage. On initial analysis, HFRT was associated with inferior OS (median 9.9 vs. 11.1 months, p<.001), but after adjusting for the imbalance in covariates such as age, BED10, T-stage and N-stage using PSMA, the difference in survival was no longer significant (p=.1). Conclusions: In the appropriate clinical context, HFRT can be an option for patients with locally advanced NSCLC who are not candidates for chemotherapy or surgical resection. HFRT needs to be further studied in prospective trials to evaluate toxicity and tumor control. © 2019, © 2019 Acta Oncologica Foundation.
Journal Title: Acta Oncologica
Volume: 59
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0284-186X
Publisher: Informa Healthcare  
Date Published: 2020-01-01
Start Page: 164
End Page: 170
Language: English
DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1675907
PUBMED: 31608751
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC7493987
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 March 2020 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Zhigang Zhang
    427 Zhang
  2. Daphna Y Gelblum
    227 Gelblum
  3. Andreas Rimner
    524 Rimner
  4. Abraham Jing-Ching Wu
    399 Wu
  5. Aaron Tyler Wild
    19 Wild
  6. Annemarie Fernandes Shepherd
    103 Shepherd
  7. Margaret L Hannum
    17 Hannum
  8. Charles Brian Simone
    190 Simone