End of life: Expert care and support, not physician-hastened death Editorial


Authors: Masdeu, J. C.; Aksamit, A. J.; Carver, A. C.; Foley, K. M.; Kass, J. S.; Martin, R. A.; McCusker, E. A.; McQuillen, M. P.; Mehanna, R.; Payne, R.; Victor, S. J.; Warach, S.
Title: End of life: Expert care and support, not physician-hastened death
Abstract: In legal physician-hastened death, a physician prescribes medication with the primary intent of causing the death of a willing terminally ill patient. This practice differs radically from palliative sedation, intended to relieve a patient's suffering rather than cause a patient's death. In this position paper, we argue that the practice of physician-hastened death is contrary to the interests of patients, their families, and the sound ethical practice of medicine. Therefore, the American Academy of Neurology should advise its members against this practice, as it had done until 2018. Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.
Keywords: adult; sedation; terminally ill patient; physician; neurology; human; article; sound
Journal Title: Neurology
Volume: 93
Issue: 17
ISSN: 0028-3878
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2019-10-22
Start Page: 729
End Page: 734
Language: English
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000008356
PUBMED: 31530709
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC6946468
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 November 2019 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Alan C Carver
    32 Carver
  2. Kathleen M Foley
    199 Foley