Estrogen replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer: Results from the case-control surveillance study Journal Article


Authors: Kaufman, D. W.; Palmer, J. R.; de Mouzon, J.; Rosenberg, L.; Stolley, P. D.; Warshauer, M. E.; Zauber, A. G.; Shapiro, S.
Article Title: Estrogen replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer: Results from the case-control surveillance study
Abstract: To examine the relation of noncontraceptive estrogen use to the risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women, the authors conducted a case-control study: 1,686 cases were compared with 2,077 hospital control subjects, of whom 1,120 had non-gynecologic cancers and 957 had nonmalignant (also non-gynecologic) conditions. Data were obtained from 1980 to 1986, by interview of subjects in hospitals in the United States and Canada. The relative risk estimate for any use of replacement estrogens unopposed by progestogens was 1.2 (95% confidence interval (Cl) 1.0-1.4), after adjustment for age and type of menopause; when all known risk factors for breast cancer were taken into account in a multivariate analysis, the estimate was similar. For use of at least 15 years duration, the estimate was 0.9 (95% Cl 0.5-1.9). Most of the unopposed use was of conjugated estrogens: overall, the relative risk (95% Cl) was 1.3 (1.0-1.6); for durations of 15 or more years, it was 0.9 (0.4-1.9); for use of 5 years followed by a latent interval of 15 or more years, it was 1.3 (0.7-2.4); and for current use it was 1.1 (0.7-1.6). There was no evidence of increased breast cancer risk when the conjugated estrogen users were divided according to dose. There was little use of estrogens opposed by progestogens; the relative risk estimate was 1.7 (95% Cl 0.9-3.3). The results of this large study provide no evidence that the use of unopposed conjugated estrogens increases the risk of breast cancer, even after long durations of use or long latent intervals, but the possibility of a modest increase (less than a doubling) could not be excluded. There were insufficient data to evaluate the effects of noncon-jugated estrogens and of combined estrogen and progestogen therapy. Am J Epidemiol 1991;134:1375-85. © 1991 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health.
Keywords: adult; aged; case-control studies; cancer risk; united states; neoplasms; breast cancer; biology; estrogen; risk factors; age factors; breast neoplasms; risk factor; physiology; questionnaires; body mass index; estrogen replacement therapy; data analysis; measurement; multivariate analysis; menopause; population surveillance; canada; diseases; north america; hormones; human experiment; conjugated estrogen; bias; endocrine system; gestagen; studies; middle age; family planning; contraceptives, oral; parity; case control studies; developed countries; americas; research methodology; contraception; cancer; human; female; priority journal; article; control groups; support, non-u.s. gov't; support, u.s. gov't, p.h.s.; northern america; fibrocystic disease of breast; error sources; contraception continuation--statistics; contraceptive usage; estrogens--administraction and dosage; estrogens--analysis; estrogens, conjugated
Journal Title: American Journal of Epidemiology
Volume: 134
Issue: 12
ISSN: 0002-9262
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 1991-12-15
Start Page: 1375
End Page: 1385
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116041
PUBMED: 1663700
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 27 September 2019 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Ann G Zauber
    314 Zauber