Measurement invariance of intuitive cancer risk perceptions across diverse populations: The Cognitive Causation and Negative Affect in Risk scales Journal Article


Authors: Baser, R. E.; Li, Y.; Brennessel, D.; Kemeny, M. M.; Hay, J. L.
Article Title: Measurement invariance of intuitive cancer risk perceptions across diverse populations: The Cognitive Causation and Negative Affect in Risk scales
Abstract: Intuitive cancer risk perceptions may inform strategies to motivate cancer prevention behaviors. This study evaluated factor structure and measurement invariance of two new measures of intuitive cancer risk, the Cognitive Causation and Negative Affect in Risk scales. Single- and multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis models were fit to responses from three diverse samples. The confirmatory factor analysis models fit the data well, with all comparative fit indices (CFI) ≥ 0.94. Items flagged by chi-square difference tests as potentially non-invariant were largely invariant between samples according to practical fit indices (e.g. ΔCFI). These novel scales may be particularly relevant in diverse, underserved populations. © The Author(s) 2017.
Keywords: clinical article; case report; cancer risk; validation process; risk; measurement; perception; human experiment; confirmatory factor analysis; diversity; cancer risk perceptions; human; article; construct validation; measurement invariance
Journal Title: Journal of Health Psychology
Volume: 24
Issue: 9
ISSN: 1359-1053
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.  
Date Published: 2019-08-01
Start Page: 1221
End Page: 1232
Language: English
DOI: 10.1177/1359105317693910
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 28810422
PMCID: PMC7906483
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 2 August 2019 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Yuelin Li
    219 Li
  2. Raymond E Baser
    133 Baser
  3. Jennifer L Hay
    264 Hay