Mobile mammographic screening of self-referred women: Results of 22,540 screenings Journal Article


Authors: Dershaw, D. D.; Liberman, L.; Lippin, B. S.
Article Title: Mobile mammographic screening of self-referred women: Results of 22,540 screenings
Abstract: In this mass screening mammography program, self-referred women are accepted for screening only if part of a sponsoring organization. Screening is performed with mobile equipment, often at the work site. Of the first 22,540 screenings, 61% (n = 13,784) were of women aged 35-49 years. Eighty-nine percent (n = 20,025) of the screenings were normal. Of 51 women in whom cancer was found, 38 (75%) were recommended for biopsy on the basis of their initial two-view mammogram. The prevalence of breast cancer generally increased with advancing age but was similar between women aged 35-39 years and those aged 40-49 years. Of the 28 women with complete histologic studies, 43% (n = 12) had pure intraductal cancer and another 43% had negative findings at axillary node dissection. Program costs dictated a $65 fee. Within the design of this program it has been possible to screen large numbers of self-referred women and detect early carcinomas. Program design, however, may make screening more expensive than in a fixed screening site accepting only physician-referred women.
Keywords: adult; aged; major clinical study; cancer diagnosis; cancer incidence; breast cancer; cancer screening; mass screening; breast neoplasms; health care cost; mammography; early diagnosis; breast tumor; referral and consultation; new york city; breast biopsy; costs and cost analysis; middle age; human; female; priority journal; article; mobile health units; breast radiography, utilization; breast neoplasms, 00.30; breast, biopsy, 00.1299
Journal Title: Radiology
Volume: 184
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0033-8419
Publisher: Radiological Society of North America, Inc.  
Date Published: 1992-08-01
Start Page: 415
End Page: 419
Language: English
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.184.2.1620839
PUBMED: 1620839
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. D David Dershaw
    223 Dershaw
  2. Laura Liberman
    176 Liberman