Phase 2 trial of intraperitoneal carboplatin and etoposide as salvage treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer Journal Article


Authors: Markman, M.; Reichman, B.; Hakes, T.; Rubin, S.; Jones, W.; Lewis, J. L. Jr; Barakat, R.; Curtin, J.; Almadrones, L.; Hoskins, W.
Article Title: Phase 2 trial of intraperitoneal carboplatin and etoposide as salvage treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
Abstract: To evaluate the efficacy of intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin-based therapy as salvage treatment of ovarian cancer, 46 patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer following initial systemic chemotherapy were treated with a regimen of carboplatin (200-300 mg/m2) and etoposide (100 mg/m2) administered on a monthly schedule. A maximum of six courses of therapy was delivered, followed by a response laparotomy. The treatment program was well tolerated, except for bone marrow suppression, with one-quarter of patients developing platelet count depressions to ≤50,000/mm3, and one-third experiencing hemoglobin levels of ≤8 g/dl during treatment. Twelve (38%) of 32 patients evaluable for efficacy of the treatment program achieved a surgically documented response, including 8 (25%) complete responses. Of 25 patients whose largest tumor mass at the initiation of therapy measured ≤0.5 cm, 11 (44%) responded, including 8 (32%) complete responses. We conclude that the IP administration of carboplatin can result in surgically documented responses when used in the salvage setting in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The relative efficacy of carboplatin versus cisplatin when administered by the IP route to patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum-based systemic therapy remains to be defined. © 1992.
Keywords: adult; cancer chemotherapy; clinical article; aged; survival rate; fatigue; salvage therapy; advanced cancer; drug efficacy; multimodality cancer therapy; ovarian neoplasms; carboplatin; ovary cancer; phase 2 clinical trial; bone marrow suppression; etoposide; thrombocytopenia; vomiting; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; tumor recurrence; carcinoma; middle age; intraperitoneal drug administration; injections, intraperitoneal; human; female; priority journal; article; support, non-u.s. gov't; support, u.s. gov't, p.h.s.
Journal Title: Gynecologic Oncology
Volume: 47
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0090-8258
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 1992-12-01
Start Page: 353
End Page: 357
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(92)90139-a
PUBMED: 1473749
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 30 July 2019 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. William Hoskins
    255 Hoskins
  2. Richard R Barakat
    629 Barakat
  3. John P Curtin
    112 Curtin
  4. Lois Ann Cassidy
    72 Cassidy
  5. Thomas B Hakes
    115 Hakes
  6. Walter   Jones
    95 Jones
  7. John   Lewis
    132 Lewis
  8. Maurie Markman
    124 Markman
  9. Stephen C. Rubin
    112 Rubin