Assessment of NETest clinical utility in a U.S. registry-based study Journal Article


Authors: Liu, E.; Paulson, S.; Gulati, A.; Freudman, J.; Grosh, W.; Kafer, S.; Wickremesinghe, P. C.; Salem, R. R.; Bodei, L.
Article Title: Assessment of NETest clinical utility in a U.S. registry-based study
Abstract: Background: The clinical relevance of molecular biomarkers in oncology management has been recognized in breast and lung cancers. We evaluated a blood-based multigene assay for management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in a real-world study (U.S. registry NCT02270567). Diagnostic accuracy and relationship to clinical disease status in two cohorts (treated and watch-and-wait) were evaluated. Materials and Methods: Patients with NETs (n = 100) were followed for 6–12 months. Patients’ primary tumors were gastroenteropancreatic (68%), lung 20%, and of unknown origin (12%). Characteristics included well-differentiated, low-grade tumors (97%), stage IV disease (96%); treatment with surgery (70%); and drug treatment (56%). NETest was measured at each visit and disease status determined by RECIST. Scores categorized as low (NETest 14%–40%) or high (≥80%) defined disease as stable or progressive. Multivariate analyses determined the strength of the association with progression-free survival (PFS). Results: NETest diagnostic accuracy was 96% and concordant (95%) with image-demonstrable disease. Scores were reproducible (97%) and concordant with clinical status (98%). The NETest was the only feature linked to PFS (odds ratio, 6.1; p <.0001). High NETest correlated with progressive disease (81%; median PFS, 6 months), and low NETest correlated with stable disease (87%; median PFS, not reached). In the watch-and-wait cohort, low NETest was concordant with stable disease in 100% of patients, and high NETest was associated with management changes in 83% of patients. In the treated cohort, all low NETest patients (100%) remained stable. A high NETest was linked to intervention and treatment stabilization (100%). Use of NETest was associated with reduced imaging (biannual to annual) in 36%–38% of patients. Conclusion: Blood NETest is an accurate diagnostic and can be of use in monitoring disease status and facilitating management change in both watch-and-wait and treatment cohorts. Implications for Practice: A circulating multigene molecular biomarker to guide neuroendocrine tumor (NET) management has been developed because current biomarkers have limited clinical utility. NETest is diagnostic (96%) and in real time defines the disease status (>95%) as stable or progressive. It is >90% effective in guiding treatment decisions in conjunction with diagnostic imaging. Monitoring was effective in watch-and-wait or treatment groups. Low levels supported no management change and reduced the need for imaging. High levels indicated the need for management intervention. Real-time liquid biopsy assessment of NETs has clinical utility and can contribute additional value to patient management strategies and outcomes. © AlphaMed Press 2018
Keywords: biomarker; carcinoid; neuroendocrine; registry; liquid biopsy; net transcripts
Journal Title: The Oncologist
Volume: 24
Issue: 6
ISSN: 1083-7159
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2019-06-01
Start Page: 783
End Page: 790
Language: English
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0623
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 30158287
PMCID: PMC6656500
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 July 2019 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Lisa   Bodei
    205 Bodei