Current status of MRI and PET in the NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Guidelines


Authors: Mason, B. R.; Eastham, J. A.; Davis, B. J.; Mynderse, L. A.; Pugh, T. J.; Lee, R. J.; Ippolito, J. E.
Title: Current status of MRI and PET in the NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer
Abstract: Prostate cancer (PCa) represents a significant source of morbidity and mortality for men in the United States, with approximately 1 in 9 being diagnosed with PCa in their lifetime. The role of imaging in the evaluation of men with PCa has evolved and currently plays a central role in diagnosis, treatment planning, and evaluation of recurrence. Appropriate use of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and MRI-guided transrectal ultrasound (MR-TRUS) biopsy increases the detection of clinically significant PCa while decreasing the detection of clinically insignificant PCa. This process may help patients with clinically insignificant PCa avoid the adverse effects of unnecessary therapy. In the setting of a known PCa, patients with low-grade disease can be observed using active surveillance, which often includes a combination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, serial mpMRI, and, if indicated, follow-up systematic and targeted TRUS-guided tissue sampling. mpMRI can provide important information in the posttreatment setting, but PET/CT is creating a paradigm shift in imaging standards for patients with locally recurrent and metastatic PCa. This article examines the strengths and limitations of mpMRI for initial PCa diagnosis, active surveillance, recurrent disease evaluation, and image-guided biopsies, and the use of PET/CT imaging in men with recurrent PCa. The goal of this review is to provide a rational basis for current NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for PCa as they pertain to the use of these advanced imaging modalities.
Journal Title: Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Volume: 17
Issue: 5
ISSN: 1540-1405
Publisher: Harborside Press  
Date Published: 2019-05-01
Start Page: 506
End Page: 513
Language: English
DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7306
PUBMED: 31085758
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. James Eastham
    537 Eastham